[ITK] Question about BigTIFF
Matt McCormick
matt.mccormick at kitware.com
Sat Sep 20 12:09:55 EDT 2014
Hi Gib,
It should be a BigTIFF and it is, correct?
Thanks for your investigations.
Matt
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 2:30 AM, Gib Bogle <g.bogle at auckland.ac.nz> wrote:
> I observe that an ITK-created tiff that is bigger than 2^31 but smaller than
> 2^32 is a BigTIFF - it has Version number = 43 in the header. I am suddenly
> wondering why such a file is a BigTIFF. On this site:
> http://www.awaresystems.be/imaging/tiff/bigtiff.html
> it says:
> "The TIFF file format uses 32bit offsets and, as such, is limited to 4
> gigabytes. This has been quite sufficient for many years. Today however,
> there is a need for a good multi-purpose open image file format that can
> handle huge images, or very large collections of images, breaking the 4 gig
> boundary. There is currently an ongoing attempt to launch a new variant of
> TIFF, called BigTIFF, that closely resembles TIFF, but uses 64bit offsets
> instead...."
>
> In other words, BigTIFF is needed for files bigger than 2^32 bytes, or 4 GB.
>
> Can somebody explain this?
>
> Cheers
> Gib
>
> _______________________________________________
> Community mailing list
> Community at itk.org
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/community
>
More information about the Community
mailing list