[ITK Community] [Insight-developers] A Contrib group?

[Bradley Lowekamp]

On Jan 16, 2014, at 3:50 PM, Matt McCormick <matt.mccormick at kitware.com> wrote:

>  And, as Brad K. and
> Luis point out, a second-class-citizen Review designation is proven
> not to work well.

It's was not clear to me that a separate group for contributions was proven not to work. Certainly referring to it despairingly as "second-class" is not inspiring. Specifically what were the problems, from the previous Review?

Additionally, How is steering new contributions into remote modules, not creating a tiered system?

These remote modules just seem difficult to review/test/maintain. The my primary suggestion of the Contrib was to establish a place of the same tier no matter where the code was.

This has been a constructive and productive thread, thanks everyone.

Brad


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/community/attachments/20140116/cf3b0aea/attachment-0002.html>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers