[ITK] [ITK-dev] Missing IO factories when building without cmake

[Matt McCormick]

+1.  Bill's fix was the best one I have seen implemented.

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Bill Lorensen <bill.lorensen at gmail.com> wrote:
> We need to do something to help the users. There are 42 messages (not
> including threads) on the users list. Typically, after a few
> responses, we ask "Are you using cmake to configure your project?" Our
> suggested solutions are not consistent. My patch provided an
> explanation of the most probable cause (not using cmake) and a
> solution (register the IO's you need). These questions seem to be from
> users that are creating apps, not users of apps that someone has
> created.
>
> Bill
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Matt McCormick
> <matt.mccormick at kitware.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Jim Miller <millerjv at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Is there a way at build time whether we could whether an executable does not have any imageio factories linked in?
>>
>> Nope - the issue is caused by initialization that occurs at runtime.
>> The ImageIO classes are linked in.
>>
>> Matt
>
>
>
> --
> Unpaid intern in BillsBasement at noware dot com
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers