[Cmb-users] [Smtk-developers] Testing Data

[David Thompson]

> 
>> 6. I agree with Yumin: there should be only a ReadMe and
>> subdirectories at the top of the repo.
> 
> Do we have a license for this data? Creative Commons?

I doubt they are all under the same license as they are from many sources. That is why I suggested a ReadMe per directory.

+ The poly files like pmdc.poly are LGPL: https://people.sc.fsu.edu/~jburkardt/data/poly_3d/poly_3d.html

+ Some of the BRep (OpenCascade), IGES, and STEP models (the ones I added) are from CGM and licensed as it is (LGPL). I don't know about all of the others in solidModels.

+ The disk_out_ref.ex2 Exodus model is from Sandia and included in ParaView's test data. Whatever license there applies.

+ The pillbox netCDF model is from SLAC but is also distributed with ParaView (to test its SLAC reader).

	David