[Cmb-users] Testing Data

[David Thompson]

Hi all,

> I’ve created a possible new organization for testing data - checkout my new-organization branch in my CMB Testing Data Repo
> 
> Let me know what you think.

1. Thanks for switching to lowercase names.

2. Can we split solidModels into step, occ, iges, sat (if we have any), etc.?

3. I would argue the models in solidModels/problemModels should not be classified by whether they currently give us trouble or not... just by file type. Other classification information could go into a ReadMe (which we should probably put in each directory as we add files -- at a minimum to say where they came from).

4. The CMB files in MeshToModelMapping should move into filetype directories.

5. I would argue that directory names should not include "Files" (e.g., SimulationFiles => simulation, PolyFiles => poly, MapFiles => map, ...).

6. I agree with Yumin: there should be only a ReadMe and subdirectories at the top of the repo.

	My 2 cents,
	David