[CMake] CPack with BZIP2 is a lot slower than GNU tar
Alessio
masariello+cmake.org at gmail.com
Wed Jun 1 08:26:57 EDT 2016
Hi All
Is anyone else having problems with the speed of cpack?
Out of one of our code bases we produce two packages on Linux using the
BZIP2 generator with CMake 3.4.0. I provide a few stats on the packages
below. They are not particularly fat. GNU tar will take ~1min to tar the
biggest one up with the same compression tech.
CPack takes a good 4~5min for each of them.
I do realize cpack does a lot more than just "tar'ring", but I was
wondering if people had any pointers on how to make it run faster. Things
to avoid, etc.
Any advice greatly appreciated.
Thank you
Main package
file# size file type
------------------------------------
131 33MB binaries
7591 376MB pythonscripts
Unit tests package
file# size file type
--------------------------------
23 129MB binaries
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/cmake/attachments/20160601/768bd599/attachment.html>
More information about the CMake
mailing list