[CMake] Tests with assert and Release build type

[Magnus Therning]

Ruslan Baratov writes:

> On 20-Dec-15 01:31, Magnus Therning wrote:
>> Ruslan Baratov writes:
>>
>>> How about using RelWithDebInfo? See:
>>> http://stackoverflow.com/a/28124715/2288008
>> Hmm, I'm probably missing something but how does that solve the issue
>> with some targets requiring NDEBUG to be *undefined* and other targets
>> requiring NDEBUG to be defined?
> I don't think that building targets with different NDEBUG values is a
> good idea. More correct approach will be to introduce custom macro to
> allow checks (i.e. FOO_NDEBUG/FOO_DEBUG).

Why not?

/M

--
Magnus Therning              OpenPGP: 0x927912051716CE39
email: magnus at therning.org   jabber: magnus at therning.org
twitter: magthe               http://therning.org/magnus

We act as though comfort and luxury were the chief requirements of
life, when all that we need to make us happy is something to be
enthusiastic about.
     -- Albert Einstein
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 800 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/cmake/attachments/20151221/29f414a2/attachment.sig>