[CMake] Is this expected behavior?

[Chris Johnson]

That's the strange thing.  All the dependencies in those files in the real
project look right.  It's as if they are just not getting used during the
library compile, although they do get used when the program is linked to
the library and the "current-ness" of the library is checked before the
actual link.

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Bill Hoffman <bill.hoffman at kitware.com>
wrote:

> On 12/9/2014 9:45 AM, Chris Johnson wrote:
>
>> Well of course it had to not be all that simple.  My first attempt to
>> create a simple (2 header files in library) example failed to fail in
>> the same way as my much more complex real-life project.  :-p
>>
>> I will continue to try to whittle down the real problem to the smallest
>> possible set, but it may take a while.
>>
> find . -name depend.make
> in the build tree will show you were all the depend information is kept.
> Those files will not be populated until after the first build.  But that
> might give you a clue as to what is going wrong.
>
>
> -Bill
>
> --
>
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
> http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
>
> Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more
> information on each offering, please visit:
>
> CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html
> CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html
> CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/
> opensource/opensource.html
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/cmake/attachments/20141209/0603595f/attachment.html>