[CMake] Explanation....

[Theodore Papadopoulo]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 04/24/2014 12:31 PM, David Cole wrote:
>> You sure? When I checked, this did not work. Also, the following 
>> gives me a syntax error:

> 
> I, for one, would fully support breaking backwards compatibility to
> fix this, and be strict with variable and macro and function name 
> identifiers.
> 
> It's just ridiculous to waste time trying to justify the existing 
> behavior. It's more confusing than useful, and ought to be
> changed.

+ 1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlNaL6UACgkQEr8WrU8nPV1TuACeJR8lNfWL6vDUDwnKLpkguvSm
/yAAnibx3MX9EbY0EQyfdjrqBnvN5cfq
=HLhL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----