[CMake] Can we control component package name in 2.8.8?

[hce]

Hi Eric,

>> That is not a good format of rpm package name. Can we take control the
>> component package name in 2.8.8?

> Not yet see:
> http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=12997

> Won't probably be in 2.8.9 either.
> I know it will be useful for many of us, I just lack time to go through
> it.
> The work is not that difficult but it has many potential impact so that
> we shall take time to do it carefully.

Has the issue been resolved in 2.8.10? 

Thank you.

Kind regards.

Jupiter


Eric Noulard wrote
> 2012/6/27 hce <

> jupiter.hce@

> >:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've read some discussions posted ten months ago on
>> http://cmake.3232098.n2.nabble.com/Component-Package-Name-td6976896.html
>> where Eric Noulard pointed out that we could not control component
>> package
>> name for the reason of unique package name. I am currently running on
>> 2.8.8
>> and generated very funny component package name:
>>
>>  foo-1.1-1.0.el6.x86_64-FooComponent.rpm, it basically set by following
>> format:
>>
>> ${CPACK_PACKAGE_NAME}-${CPACK_PACKAGE_VERSION}-${CPACK_SYSTEM_NAME}-${COMPONENT_NAME}.rpm
>>
>> That is not a good format of rpm package name. Can we take control the
>> component package name in 2.8.8?
> 
> Not yet see:
> http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=12997
> 
> Won't probably be in 2.8.9 either.
> I know it will be useful for many of us, I just lack time to go through
> it.
> The work is not that difficult but it has many potential impact so that
> we shall take time to do it carefully.
> 
>> BTW, when I build two packages foo-1.1 and , the bin-1.2, the CPack
>> generates an extra Unspecified package, theCPackConfig.cmake set:
>>
>> SET(CPACK_COMPONENTS_ALL
>> "foo-1.1-1.0.el6.x86_64;bin-1.2-1.el6.x86_6;Unspecified")
>>
>> Where the Unspecified come from and now can I fix it?
> 
> As Micha said, this comes from an INSTALL statement which
> does not contains COMPONENT.
> see
> http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/CMake:Component_Install_With_CPack#Specificying_components_and_groups
> 
> or this recent discussion:
> http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2012-June/050855.html
> 
> 
> -- 
> Erk
> Le gouvernement représentatif n'est pas la démocratie --
> http://www.le-message.org
> --
> 
> Powered by www.kitware.com
> 
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> 
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
> http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
> 
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake





--
View this message in context: http://cmake.3232098.n2.nabble.com/Can-we-control-component-package-name-in-2-8-8-tp7580641p7583465.html
Sent from the CMake mailing list archive at Nabble.com.