[CMake] Package installation conundrum

[Alexander Neundorf]

On Wednesday 09 May 2012, Michael Wild wrote:
> On 09.05.2012, at 21:03, Alexander Neundorf <a.neundorf-work at gmx.net> wrote:
...
> > > # configure the headers into the build tree so the package can be used
> > > # without installing it and not hard-coding the source/build directory
> > > # information into FooConfig.cmake
> > > configure_file(include/foo.h
> > > ${PROJECT_BINARY_DIR}/include/foo.h COPYONLY)
> > 
> > The input file should have a suffix which indicates it is a file which is
> > intended to be configured, usually foo.h.in. Alex
> 
> I don't agree, since it's COPYONLY. Besides, with a little more work in
> FooConfig.cmake you can skip that step...

Oh, sorry, I missed the COPYONLY.

Alex
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/attachments/20120509/46e87543/attachment.htm>