[CMake] VC++10 change WIN32_EXECUTABLE per configuration

David Cole david.cole at kitware.com
Tue Jul 31 07:42:34 EDT 2012


CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE is not set for Visual Studio or Xcode generators...

It's a build-time choice.


On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 5:03 AM, Brett Delle Grazie
<brett.dellegrazie at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 31 July 2012 01:05, Steve deRosier <derosier at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I need a way to have the WIN32_EXECUTABLE property set off for debug
>> builds and on for release builds when using the IDE.
>>
>> Here's the deal: For debug our code uses the standard main()
>> construct, and for release we use the WinMain(). Lets just say there's
>> a reason and leave it at that...
>> The obvious solution is to be able to specify the '/subsystem:windows'
>> flag myself in LINK_FLAGS_DEBUG and LINK_FLAGS_RELEASE.
>>
>> But, the generator overrides these settings for me.  So, I found the
>> WIN32 for add_executable(), but of course you can't specify that
>> differently for debug vs release.
>>
>> For a make-file generator, I could just utilize:
>> if( "${CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE}" STREQUAL "Debug" )
>> ...
>> elseif( "${CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE}" STREQUAL "Release" )
>> ...
>> endif()
>>
>> but of course this doesn't work when generating for VS10 IDE.
>>
>> I found the CMAKE_CREATE_WIN32_EXE variable, but overriding it to ""
>> does nothing, so I resorted to looking at cmake's source code, which
>> totally ignores that variable, and hard codes the linker flag in the
>> output based on the WIN32_EXECUTABLE property! (see line 1409 of
>> cmVisualStudio10TargetGenerator.cxx).
>>
>> OK, other than hacking the cmake source and rolling our own, so is
>> there any way to:
>> 1. Override the setting after-the-fact but before the project files
>> are actually written?
>> 2. Set the WIN32_EXECUTABLE property on a per-configuration basis?
>>
>> At the moment I see four options-> hack the cmake source and roll our
>> own; do some post-processing on the produced project files; Force
>> everyone to manually change the flag in the IDE; convince my client to
>> restructure some code so we don't encounter this problem in the first
>> place.
>>
>> I'm hoping there's more options out there that are pure project.cmake
>> file-based. Anyone?
>
> How about just defining two different projects:
>
> if (CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE STREQUAL "Debug")
>   add_executable( sample_debug ${sample_SRCS})
> else()
>   add_executable( sample_release WIN32 ${sample_SRCS})
> endif()
>
> caveat empor: completely untested and off the top of my head.  Could
> also use MATCHES in the if condition in case you have other build
> types
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> - Steve
>> --
>>
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
>>
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Brett Delle Grazie
> --
>
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake


More information about the CMake mailing list