[CMake] FYI - From Ninja-build mailing list - Fwd: Proposal: restat rules
Peter Kuemmel
syntheticpp at gmx.net
Thu Sep 29 19:36:49 EDT 2011
>
> Tested cmake/ninja with Blender's cmake files, works well, and fast!
> Single file rebuild is 0.97 sec, same on makefiles was 3.7sec.
>
I also have some numbers:
----------------------------
Building LyX (lyx.org, 676 files):
LyX has autotools and cmake as build system.
* cmake generated ninja files:
1. build
cmake -G Ninja
time ninja
real 1m15.862s
2. dry run
ninja
real 0m0.113s
3. rebuild one file
touch ../trunk/src/LyX.cpp
time ninja
real 0m7.340s
* cmake generated Makefiles:
1. build
cmake ../trunk
time make -j9
real 1m19.471s
2. dry run
time make -j9
real 0m1.457s
3. rebuild one file
touch ../trunk/src/LyX.cpp
time make -j9
real 0m7.952s
* autotools:
1. build
./configure --enable-build-type=dev (maybe different to cmake configuration)
time make -j9
real 3m19.988s
2. dry run
time make -j9
real 0m2.165s
3. rebuild one file
touch ../trunk/src/LyX.cpp
time make -j9
real 0m13.087s
Summary:
build dry rebuild
ninja 1m15.8 0m0.1 0m07.3
make 1m19.4 0m1.4 0m07.9
auto 3m19.9 0m2.1 0m13.0
So only the dry run shows a huge speedup (10-20 times faster)
-----------------------------------------------
And with a bigger project (clang, 1703 files):
build dry
ninja 8m29.7 0m0.16
make 7m52.9 0m1.42
Also here the dry run is much faster.
Used sources:
cmake: git://github.com/pcc/CMake/tree/ninja-generator
ninja: git://github.com/pcc/ninja.git/tree/outputs-ready
--
NEU: FreePhone - 0ct/min Handyspartarif mit Geld-zurück-Garantie!
Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone
More information about the CMake
mailing list