[CMake] Debug/Release configurations for codeblocks ?

Olaf van der Spek olafvdspek at gmail.com
Mon Jul 26 14:23:26 EDT 2010

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Michael Jackson
<mike.jackson at bluequartz.net> wrote:
> Because it may horrendously interfere with my current established workflows


> but I would be open to trying this out. The main issue I can think of is the
> whole release/debug versions of libraries clobbering each other during the
> build. This would force an updated policy for the decorating of
> library/executable names or generating sub folders for each type of build
> configuration.

Doesn't Code Blocks have a convention like this already?

> Didn't we just discuss this in another thread?

Yes, we did.

> The default is for CMake to generate a "Release" configuration for Makefile
> based projects. ie, if you do NOT specify or otherwise set CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE
> then you will be a "Release" configuration.

AFAIK that's false.


More information about the CMake mailing list