[CMake] Function for visibility definitions

Christian Ehrlicher Ch.Ehrlicher at gmx.de
Thu Feb 11 01:41:32 EST 2010


Hilton Medeiros schrieb:
> Thanks for pointing that mistake, I fixed it.
> 
> About g++: g++ is gcc with -lstdc++
> 
> What is wrong with a simple CMake file?
> I know what is good about it, if CMake had it built in
> neither me nor any CMake user would need to write neither a simple
> header file nor a simple CMake file.
> 
I don't see how this should work without a header file. How should i use
those defines in my source at all?
The better have a simple header-file...


Christian

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 259 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/attachments/20100211/a6540607/attachment-0001.pgp>


More information about the CMake mailing list