[CMake] CMake bug tracker discussion

Bill Hoffman bill.hoffman at kitware.com
Fri Dec 10 12:31:23 EST 2010


On 12/10/2010 11:01 AM, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Bill Hoffman<bill.hoffman at kitware.com>  wrote:
>> I have a third idea that we have not yet tried:
>>
>> What do people think of automatically closing bugs if they are not modified
>> for some period of time (say 6 months).   They can always be reopened if the
>> closed.   By closing them, it will notify those that have expressed interest
>> in the bug.  We could send the closed bugs to the cmake-developer list just
>> like the new ones.  That way all developers will know that they are being
>> closed.
>
> It's a bad idea, IMHO.
>
> If a user took the time to file a bug and CMake developers do nothing
> in 6 months, closing it is the wrong thing to do.
>
> The message you are sending to the bugreporter is "I didn't care about
> the bug you reported in 6 months, and now I will care even less". For
> an example, see what I said yesterday about bug 8707: two years later,
> a patch provided, still no action on Kitware's side.
Right, and by closing that bug after six months with a message like: "If 
you are still interested in this issue, please re-open and comment. You 
may want to bring this issue up on the CMake mailing list as well."

I am thinking that issues like 8707 would not be forgotten because they 
would be re-opened and eventually addressed.  So, by closing the issue, 
it would keep the issues from getting stale.

-Bill


More information about the CMake mailing list