[CMake] Coverage information overestimated? Globbing for *.gcno instead of *.gcda?

[Bill Hoffman]

Daniel Blezek wrote:
> Hi Bill,
> 
>   I bumped into this problem as well.  We had several classes that were
> compiled, but no methods in them were run.  CTest ignored them and we didn't
> have any coverage information on our dashboard.  I would second this
> recommendation to accumulate coverage based on what is compiled.  As far as
> I'm concerned code that is not executed is totally broken, but there is no
> way to have CTest/CDash tell us.
> 

Thanks, I get it now...

Tom, Please create a feature request.  If you have a patch that would be 
even better, if not, I will put it on the list.

Thanks.

-Bill