[CMake] [ctest] junit xml output

[Reinhold]

Hi Maik and David,
 
Indeed a great idea -- I would be very much interested into it, in
particularly into junit xml output due to being "Ant-focused".
 
Note that we are currently implementing our C++ unit tests with cppunit,
and are then wrapping each cppunit test case into a ctest call for the
sake of security in our Ant-based CI on the buildserver.
 
This is another reason why I prefer junit xml output, because it is easy
(or maybe more correct: here I know how easy it is) to merge several
independent junit xml reports (cf. CI and isolation and wrapping each
cppunit test case into a ctest call).
 
Regards,
    Reinhold

-----Original Message-----
From: cmake-bounces at cmake.org [mailto:cmake-bounces at cmake.org] On Behalf
Of David Cole
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 1:02 PM
To: Maik Beckmann
Cc: cmake at cmake.org
Subject: Re: [CMake] [ctest] junit xml output


That's a great idea! Are cppunit and nunit output formats similar enough
to junit that they could all be done at once...?

Feel free to submit a patch implementing this as a feature request in
the bug tracker... or to create a CMake Wiki page with details on what
output format would be useful for this feature.

How many others out there reading this list would be interested?




On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 7:22 AM, Maik Beckmann
<beckmann.maik at googlemail.com> wrote:


Hi,

I thinking about working on ant's junit xml format as a secondary output
format of ctest.  This way it would be much more convenient to integrate
ctest results into one of the java centric/compatible dashboards.

The idea came to my mind when considering hudson
(https://hudson.dev.java.net/) as a lightweight continuous integration
system
for one-person usage.

An option may be distributing a ctest_to_junit.xsl file, but teaching it
to
ctest makes it much more easy to use.

What do you people think?


-- Maik
_______________________________________________
CMake mailing list
CMake at cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/attachments/20080519/555b12d4/attachment.htm>