[cmake-developers] The CMake bug tracker and "the backlog" of unresolved issues

David Cole david.cole at kitware.com
Thu Mar 10 15:21:53 EST 2011


On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Alexander Neundorf <neundorf at kde.org>wrote:

> On Friday 04 February 2011, David Cole wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 4:22 AM, Eric Noulard <eric.noulard at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > 2011/2/4 Michael Wild <themiwi at gmail.com>:
> > > > You could actually add a "backlog" status by customising the
> > >
> > > configuration:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> http://manual.mantisbt.org/manual.customizing.mantis.customizing.status.v
> > >alues.php
> > >
> > > > This would be IMHO much less confusing and also much easier to use
> when
> > > > searching/filtering.
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > I agree with Michael,
> > > my previous proposal assumed you (Kitware)
> > > were not willing to change your Mantis config for whatever reason.
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Erk
> > > Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » -
> > > http://www.april.org
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cmake-developers mailing list
> > > cmake-developers at cmake.org
> > > http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
> >
> > Thanks for the feedback, guys. The "problem" is that we share the mantis
> > tracker with several open source projects. I'll ask around today and see
> if
> > anybody minds adding a "backlog" status to *all* our projects. (Or maybe
> > it's possible to add a custom status value just for the CMake
> project...?)
>
> So, if I have an issue assigned to me which I don't feel like working on in
> the forseeable future I should assign it to nobody and set it to backlog ?
>
> Alex
> _______________________________________________
> cmake-developers mailing list
> cmake-developers at cmake.org
> http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
>

Yes... That would be good.

Although, if it's just that you don't feel like working on it, but it may be
important, perhaps you should point us all to it and ask if any of us wants
to take it instead.


Thanks,
David
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/cmake-developers/attachments/20110310/798cd83d/attachment.html>


More information about the cmake-developers mailing list