[cmake-developers] dependency scanning speed

[Bill Hoffman]

At 05:29 PM 9/12/2006, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
>On Tuesday 12 September 2006 20:37, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
>...
>> Here is more info:
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29037
>
>Attached is a new version of the patch which uses clear() and operator+=(const 
>std::string&) instead of operator=(const std::string&) which seems to be the 
>best and least hackish way (see gcc bug report above).

Good work, of course that will cause some other compiler to be twice as slow
for some reason I am sure.  :) 
I don't see why we can't use it.

-Bill