[Cdash] Emma coverage

[Nils Gladitz]

On 10.04.2015 17:32, Zack Galbreath wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Nils Gladitz <nilsgladitz at gmail.com 
> <mailto:nilsgladitz at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     I still have to look into how I'll run all this from the ctest
>     client script rather than the project itself.
>
>
> Locally I'm doing something very similar to CTestCoverageCollectGCOV, 
> but this hasn't made it into CMake/Modules yet.
>

Yes that is what I got too now.


>     Maybe it would make sense to mirror the package hierarchy for the
>     .json output files to disambiguate in case there are multiple
>     classes sharing the same name in different packages?
>     Or is there already some other mechanism that I am overlooking?
>
>
> The .json files should contain the package of the class.  This is what 
> CDash uses to report the coverage, as opposed to the per-directory 
> view that it uses for gcov.

Doesn't that break though if there are two classes with the same name in 
two distinct packages?

Nils
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/cdash/attachments/20150410/5616fc13/attachment-0001.htm>