[Cdash] No email on failed continuous builds
julien.jomier at kitware.com
Sun Jun 22 18:23:46 UTC 2008
Trevor Kellaway wrote:
>> I meant to say the 1-0-1 patch with the new fixes committed
>> to the 1-0 branch.
> This is what I expected, but shouldn't the version number (display in
> the footer) have also been updated?
It's updated, we just didn't but the 1.0.1 release yet.
> What I was trying to highlight was that it appears that 1.0.0 has been
> updated after its first release with subsequent fixes. This means there
> was no way to tell the difference between the two 1.0.0 versions except
> for SVN revision number, a potential nightmare for bug reporting.
> This is not a criticism, just pointing out that I hope this update was a
Totally agree with you. That's why we didn't send a formal announcement
of the 1.0.1 release (because it's not tagged yet).
More information about the CDash