[Cdash] No email on failed continuous builds

Julien Jomier julien.jomier at kitware.com
Sun Jun 22 18:23:46 UTC 2008

Trevor Kellaway wrote:
 > Julien,
 >> I meant to say the 1-0-1 patch with the new fixes committed
 >> to the 1-0 branch.
 > This is what I expected, but shouldn't the version number (display in
 > the footer) have also been updated?

It's updated, we just didn't but the 1.0.1 release yet.

 > What I was trying to highlight was that it appears that 1.0.0 has been
 > updated after its first release with subsequent fixes. This means there
 > was no way to tell the difference between the two 1.0.0 versions except
 > for SVN revision number, a potential nightmare for bug reporting.
 > This is not a criticism, just pointing out that I hope this update was a
 > mistake.

Totally agree with you. That's why we didn't send a formal announcement 
of the 1.0.1 release (because it's not tagged yet).

Thanks again,

More information about the CDash mailing list