Proposals:Compiling on Bluegene Supercomputer

From KitwarePublic
Revision as of 23:11, 25 March 2008 by Arunachalam (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigationJump to search

This page describes the changes that are needed in ITK in order to make possible to build it in the Bluegene/L supercomputer.

The tests have been developed at the Bluegene/L machine available at the Rensselaer Polytechnic InstituteRPI. This computer, located at the RPI Computational Center for Nanotechnology Innovations is the seventh worlds largest supercomputer, according to the Top500 list released on June 2007.

Developers

  • Arunachalam Narayanaswamy
  • Pat Marion
  • Luis Ibanez

List of Changes using the mpixlC compiler

  • Remove optimization (use -O0) from the following files
    • Insight/Utilities/vxl/v3p/netlib/linpack
      • csvdc.c
      • zsvdc.c
    • Done by adding a SET_SOURCE_FILES_PROPERTIES() command in the CMakeLists.txt file of "netlib".

Too many changes to be made along the way. The maximum I got to was 60%. I've deferred this job for later.

Notes for compiling using mpicc compiler

This is a MPI wrapper written over the gnu compiler for PowerPC.

There are two ways to do this

1) Compile using the MPI wrapper itself

   The problem with this is that the MPI wrapper itself is not small, and there is no need to set the 

optimization flags (which makes compilation slow usually) used by the wrapper. More often than not it will interfere adversely with your CMake setup. Nevertheless, this is one option.

2) Compile using the gnu compiler used by the wrapper

   The problem with this is that CMake will force the C/C++ compiler for all projects that use ITK later,
to be this. This means, you cannot just set the MPI Wrapper for all future compilation of the project by 

setting CMAKE_C(XX)_COMPILER. So, the way I did it is to have a local copy of the gnu compiler (used inside the wrapper) and name it as mpicc/mpicxx. Later, I'll replace it with the original MPI wrappers for all my

future projects. I know, this is a dirty hack for now. CMake is happy, and so are we!

From here on, I'll talk about the problems that you *might* encounter in the method 2. Feel free to try 1