ITK/Release 4/DICOM/Tcon 2010 10 11: Difference between revisions

From KitwarePublic
< ITK‎ | Release 4‎ | DICOM
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 12: Line 12:
** Drop Presentation Data Value for Pixel Data (requested extent) ?
** Drop Presentation Data Value for Pixel Data (requested extent) ?
* Interface for Abstract DICOM DataSet /
* Interface for Abstract DICOM DataSet /
** Follow App 118 syntax
** Follow App 118 syntax (see below)
** Very simple interface (eg. [http://www.vtk.org/doc/nightly/html/classvtkMedicalImageProperties.html vtkMedicalImageProperties]). Not extensible
** Very simple interface (eg. [http://www.vtk.org/doc/nightly/html/classvtkMedicalImageProperties.html vtkMedicalImageProperties]). Not extensible
* C-FIND interface ?
* C-FIND interface ?

Revision as of 14:18, 26 September 2010

Attendees

  • Mathieu Malaterre (CoSMo)

Topics

  • Implementation details:
    • Support GDCM ?
    • Support DCMTK ?
    • Support CTN ?
    • Third party ?
  • Should we support Extensions:
    • kerberos ?
    • TLS ?

App 118 Syntax

See:

A.1.7 Examples

Here is an example XPath query to extract the code meaning of the first item in the View Code Sequence:
/DicomNativeModel/DicomAttribute[@keyword=‖ViewCodeSequence‖]/Item[@number=1]/ /DicomAttribute[@keyword=‖CodeMeaning‖]/Value[@number=1]
1405

See posts

> The following XPath expression is not defined:
>
> DicomAttribute[@tag=”OverlayLabel”]/Value[@number=1]
>
DicomAttribute[@tag=”OverlayLabel” and @repeating="02"]/Value[@number=1]