|
Notes |
|
|
(0016658)
|
|
Julien Jomier
|
|
2009-06-08 17:55
|
|
|
Could you try switching the CVS viewer from "ViewVC" to "ViewVC1.1" and see if that does the trick? |
|
|
|
(0016659)
|
|
Torsten Rohlfing
|
|
2009-06-08 17:58
|
|
|
|
|
(0016660)
|
|
Julien Jomier
|
|
2009-06-08 18:06
|
|
|
We might have to change CDash to support the URL. It seems that there is a lot of URLs possible for ViewVC. Can this wait until the next release? If not I'll try to send you a patch soon. |
|
|
|
(0016661)
|
|
Torsten Rohlfing
|
|
2009-06-08 18:36
|
|
|
No rush here; thanks. I assume you're going to register the availability of the fixed version with this bug, so I should be notified, which is all I'd ask for. |
|
|
|
(0016662)
|
|
Julien Jomier
|
|
2009-06-08 19:49
|
|
|
Could you try with selecting "ViewCVS" as the repository browser in CDash? ViewVC is the new version of ViewCVS and looking at the generated URL, it seems that it might work. Let me know. |
|
|
|
(0016664)
|
|
Torsten Rohlfing
|
|
2009-06-08 22:58
|
|
Ha, okay, this is interesting:
If I use "ViewCVS" AND set the ViewCVS URL to
www.nitrc.org/plugins/scmsvn/viewcvs.php/trunk/core/?root=cmtk
that is, if I include the missing "trunk/core/" part of the URL, THEN it sort of works (I am not getting an NITRC redirect page; looks like they don't allow deep links into the ViewVC).
So I guess the original is a combination of
- having to use ViewCVS even though system is running ViewVC, and
- root of the source tree not being root of the SVN repo, which is strange, 'cos I have had this setup before with no problems... |
|
|
|
(0016665)
|
|
Torsten Rohlfing
|
|
2009-06-08 22:58
|
|
|
In previous note, sustitute "NOW getting NITRC redirect page" for "not getting..." |
|
|
|
(0016668)
|
|
Julien Jomier
|
|
2009-06-09 09:02
|
|
|
The ViewCVS v.s ViewVC is understandable (ViewVC is the new name for the ViewCVS). The source tree not being root of the SVN repository is another issue and is probably related to CTest somehow. If that works for you I'm going to mark this issue resolved, unless you think there is something else we can do. Thanks again for the report! |
|