<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div>Hi Martin,<br><br></div>I haven't looked closely enough at vtkTensors (I don't know if I even knew about it before today) but indeed the ordering output in vtkCellDerivatives for a velocity vector {u,v,w} needs to be [du/dx, du/dy, du/dz, dv/dx, dv/dy, ...] like you have it. I'm not sure when vtkTensors is ordered the way it is.<br><br></div>Cheers,<br></div>Andy<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Martin Genet <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:martin.genet@polytechnique.edu" target="_blank">martin.genet@polytechnique.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
  
    
  
  <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    Thanks Andy.<br>
    <br>
    I need to clarify something: the Derivatives function of vtkCell
    objects returns a derivs vector containing the components of the
    gradient of some vector field defined at the cell nodes; the
    components are ordered in row (as usually in C, i.e., (0,0), (0,1),
    (0,2), (1,0), (1,1), (1,2), (2,0), (2,1), (2,2)). Now in the
    CellDerivatives filter the derivs vector is used to fill a
    vtkTensors, and then the filter returns the internal vector storing
    the data of the vtkTensors. However, the components of the
    vtkTensors are ordered in column (as usually in fortran, i.e.,
    (0,0), (1,0), (2,0), (0,1), (1,1), (2,1), (0,2), (1,2), (2,2)). Is
    it on purpose that the vtkTensors store their data in column and not
    in row? Isn't it a little dangerous to mix both storage in the code?
    Thanks for the clarification!<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
    <br>
    Martin</font></span><div><div class="h5"><br>
    <br>
    <div>On 18/01/2016 13:32, Andy Bauer wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>Hi Martin,<br>
              <br>
            </div>
            Thanks for following up on this. I found the merge request
            now and will look at this. In general, developers should
            request others to do a code review on this. This can be done
            via something like "@acbauer please review this" or sending
            an email on this VTK list with a link to the merge request.<br>
            <br>
          </div>
          Best,<br>
        </div>
        Andy<br>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 6:23 AM, Martin
          Genet <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:martin.genet@polytechnique.edu" target="_blank">martin.genet@polytechnique.edu</a>></span>
          wrote:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
            <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> Hi Andy,<br>
              <br>
              I followed the directions, and submitted a patch (19 days
              ago), but haven't heard anything back.<br>
              <br>
              In GitLab the merge requests counter is at 0, but when I
              try to create a new merge request from my commit, it tells
              the merge request already exists. Is it being reviewed
              somewhere? Thanks!<span><font color="#888888"><br>
                  <br>
                  Martin</font></span>
              <div>
                <div><br>
                  <br>
                  <div>On 29/12/2015 13:22, Andy Bauer wrote:<br>
                  </div>
                  <blockquote type="cite">
                    <div dir="ltr">
                      <div>
                        <div>
                          <div>Hi Martin,<br>
                            <br>
                          </div>
                          This patch makes sense. It would need a test
                          if you want to get your changes into VTK. The
                          directions for contributing to VTK are at <a href="https://gitlab.kitware.com/vtk/vtk/blob/master/Documentation/dev/git/develop.md" target="_blank"></a><a href="https://gitlab.kitware.com/vtk/vtk/blob/master/Documentation/dev/git/develop.md" target="_blank">https://gitlab.kitware.com/vtk/vtk/blob/master/Documentation/dev/git/develop.md</a>.<br>
                          <br>
                        </div>
                        Cheers,<br>
                      </div>
                      Andy<br>
                    </div>
                    <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
                      <div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at
                        5:50 PM, Martin Genet <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:martin.genet@polytechnique.edu" target="_blank"></a><a href="mailto:martin.genet@polytechnique.edu" target="_blank">martin.genet@polytechnique.edu</a>></span>
                        wrote:<br>
                        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
                          <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> Thanks
                            Andy.<br>
                            <br>
                            What about simply adding another mode, e.g.
                            SetTensorModeToComputeGreenLagrangeStrain,
                            to the vtkCellDerivatives filter? Would the
                            attached patch make sense?<br>
                            <br>
                            Martin<br>
                            <br>
                            <div>On 28/12/2015 14:12, Andy Bauer wrote:<br>
                            </div>
                            <blockquote type="cite">
                              <div dir="ltr">
                                <div>
                                  <div>
                                    <div>Hi Martin,<br>
                                      <br>
                                    </div>
                                    Changing the name of the
                                    SetTensorModeToComputeStrain method
                                    to something else would break
                                    backward compatibility which is
                                    generally avoided in VTK. Other
                                    options for this include deriving a
                                    class to compute non-linear strain
                                    from vtkCellDerivatives if it shares
                                    enough of the algorithm with the
                                    linearized version or maybe just
                                    creating a new filter.<br>
                                    <br>
                                  </div>
                                  Cheers,<br>
                                </div>
                                Andy<br>
                              </div>
                              <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
                                <div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Dec 26,
                                  2015 at 4:36 PM, Martin Genet <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:martin.genet@polytechnique.edu" target="_blank"></a><a href="mailto:martin.genet@polytechnique.edu" target="_blank">martin.genet@polytechnique.edu</a>></span>
                                  wrote:<br>
                                  <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Dear VTK
                                    users:<br>
                                    <br>
                                    I realize that the
                                    vtkCellDerivatives filter, when
                                    SetTensorModeToComputeStrain is
                                    activated, returns the symmetric
                                    part of the gradient of the input
                                    vector field, which is the
                                    linearized strain tensor, i.e., not
                                    a proper measure of deformation when
                                    large displacements are involved.
                                    Would that make sense to have two
                                    different modes,
                                    SetTensorModeToComputeLinearizedStrain
                                    or
                                    SetTensorModeToComputeSymmetricGradient,
                                    and SetTensorModeToComputeStrain or
                                    SetTensorModeToComputeGreenLagrangeStrain?
                                    Thanks!<br>
                                    <br>
                                    Martin<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
                                    Powered by <a href="http://www.kitware.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://www.kitware.com" target="_blank">www.kitware.com</a><br>
                                    <br>
                                    Visit other Kitware open-source
                                    projects at <a href="http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html" target="_blank">http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html</a><br>
                                    <br>
                                    Please keep messages on-topic and
                                    check the VTK FAQ at: <a href="http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ" target="_blank">http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ</a><br>
                                    <br>
                                    Search the list archives at: <a href="http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers" target="_blank">http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers</a><br>
                                    <br>
                                    Follow this link to
                                    subscribe/unsubscribe:<br>
                                    <a href="http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers</a><br>
                                  </blockquote>
                                </div>
                                <br>
                              </div>
                            </blockquote>
                            <br>
                          </div>
                        </blockquote>
                      </div>
                      <br>
                    </div>
                  </blockquote>
                  <br>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </div></div></div>

</blockquote></div><br></div>