<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div>Hi Martin,<br><br></div>This patch makes sense. It would need a test if you want to get your changes into VTK. The directions for contributing to VTK are at <a href="https://gitlab.kitware.com/vtk/vtk/blob/master/Documentation/dev/git/develop.md">https://gitlab.kitware.com/vtk/vtk/blob/master/Documentation/dev/git/develop.md</a>.<br><br></div>Cheers,<br></div>Andy<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Martin Genet <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:martin.genet@polytechnique.edu" target="_blank">martin.genet@polytechnique.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
Thanks Andy.<br>
<br>
What about simply adding another mode, e.g.
SetTensorModeToComputeGreenLagrangeStrain, to the vtkCellDerivatives
filter? Would the attached patch make sense?<br>
<br>
Martin<br>
<br>
<div>On 28/12/2015 14:12, Andy Bauer wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>
<div>Hi Martin,<br>
<br>
</div>
Changing the name of the SetTensorModeToComputeStrain method
to something else would break backward compatibility which
is generally avoided in VTK. Other options for this include
deriving a class to compute non-linear strain from
vtkCellDerivatives if it shares enough of the algorithm with
the linearized version or maybe just creating a new filter.<br>
<br>
</div>
Cheers,<br>
</div>
Andy<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Martin
Genet <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:martin.genet@polytechnique.edu" target="_blank">martin.genet@polytechnique.edu</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Dear VTK
users:<br>
<br>
I realize that the vtkCellDerivatives filter, when
SetTensorModeToComputeStrain is activated, returns the
symmetric part of the gradient of the input vector field,
which is the linearized strain tensor, i.e., not a proper
measure of deformation when large displacements are
involved. Would that make sense to have two different modes,
SetTensorModeToComputeLinearizedStrain or
SetTensorModeToComputeSymmetricGradient, and
SetTensorModeToComputeStrain or
SetTensorModeToComputeGreenLagrangeStrain? Thanks!<br>
<br>
Martin<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Powered by <a href="http://www.kitware.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">www.kitware.com</a><br>
<br>
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at <a href="http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html" target="_blank">http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html</a><br>
<br>
Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at: <a href="http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ" target="_blank">http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ</a><br>
<br>
Search the list archives at: <a href="http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers</a><br>
<br>
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:<br>
<a href="http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>