<div dir="ltr">Serge.<div><br></div><div>You are correct.</div><div><br></div><div>We removed that to clean house in preparation for the parallel extent handling improvements. The priority streaming feature it was part of was largely unused in VTK and ParaView and we knew of no other users.</div><div><br></div><div>If the use-case you are seeing was in an Algorithm that emitted it you are fine with simply removing it. If you had something that consumed it, then there would be more work as we don't have a direct replacement for this in the works.<br></div><div><br></div><div>hth<br></div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div class="gmail_signature">David E DeMarle<br>Kitware, Inc.<br>R&D Engineer<br>21 Corporate Drive<br>Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662<br>Phone: 518-881-4909</div></div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Serge Lalonde <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:serge@infolytica.com" target="_blank">serge@infolytica.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
To answer myself (I hope) and for posterity,<br>
<br>
it looks like PRESERVE_BOUNDS() is simply obsolete. I compared other
from vtkUnstructuredGridAlgorithm derived classes in VTK between 6.1
and 6.3 and the code was simply removed. So I suspect that it's safe
to do so in my code. I'll update the list if this turns out to be
wrong.<span class=""><br>
<br>
<div>On 12/9/2015 9:13 AM, Serge Lalonde
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
Hello VTK users,<br>
<br>
VTK 6.1 had a vtkInformationIntegerKey member in vtkAlgorithm
called PRESERVES_BOUNDS().<br>
I'm upgrading to VTK 6.3 and this no longer exists (it was removed
in VTK 6.2).<br>
We us this in a class we created that's derived from
vtkUnstructuredGridAlgorithm and I`d like to know the proper way
to port it to VTK 6.3.<br>
I checked the change log between 6.1 and 6.2 and there's no
mention of it, but I suspect it was removed as part of the
parallelism changes in the pipeline.<br>
<br>
Anybody know how to handle this?<br>
</blockquote>
</span></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Powered by <a href="http://www.kitware.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">www.kitware.com</a><br>
<br>
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at <a href="http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html</a><br>
<br>
Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at: <a href="http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ</a><br>
<br>
Search the list archives at: <a href="http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers</a><br>
<br>
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:<br>
<a href="http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>