What could be wrong:
1. I removed an old copy of vtkdll.dll from the
system32 directory
2. Ran vtk23.exe and saw a new copy of vtkdll.dll
being placed in the system32 directory.
3. Compiled a simple cone example
cleanly.
4. On the build process VC++60 Linker
reports a corrupted vtkdll.dll again as in a previous release.
Has anyone validated the extracted vtkdll.dll that
is extracted from vtk23.exe ?
I don't think that any cleanly compiled code could
in any way corrupt a dll.
Nor do I think the inclusion or exclusion of any
static libs should cause the reporting of a corrupt dll.
BTW the same thing happened with vtk22.exe. By what do I know !
Was the vtk2.3 release of
vtkdll.dll created with VC++ 60 ? Perhaps creating my own .dll might be a
solution, but it still doesn't answer the question concerning VC++ 60
reporting it as being corrupt.
Seeking your best advice,
Bob Palank