[vtkusers] Different behavior of vtkXMLPUnstructuredGridWriter in VTK 7.1

Andrew Parker andy.john.parker at googlemail.com
Mon Feb 19 04:59:01 EST 2018


Andy,

I can confirm this now works for my parallel code.  However, I have a
separate stand-alone serial code (has never had a communicator) which still
calls the vtkXMLPUnstructuredGridWriter and produces several part/piece
meshes and one global pvtu file.  This now fails with 7.1.1, same error
before, only one entry in the pvtu.  I have tried to make the changes noted
in your demo file (which have worked for my parallel code) but in this
instance they do not work in my serial code.  I have also tried the
vtkDummyController as a well as vtkmpicontroller, and have also tried
explicitly setting the number of (fake) processors: vtk_mpi_controller->
SetNumberOfProcesses(4);

Could I ask what the recommended way to now use the
vtkXMLPUnstructuredGridWriter
is from a completely serial code where I still wish to write out piece
meshes (and a corresponding pvtu) and do not have a communicator?  I should
add this is not threaded code either.  The vtk 7.1.1 build is the same one
that is now working correctly in my mpi parallel code.

Cheers again,
Andy

On 6 February 2018 at 13:48, Andy Bauer <andy.bauer at kitware.com> wrote:

> My guess is that you've forgotten:
>
> controller->SetGlobalController(controller);
>
> Could you also verify that VTK was built with MPI enabled? If you try my
> example file does that work properly for you with both VTK versions?
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 4:49 AM, Andrew Parker <
> andy.john.parker at googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> Andy,
>>
>> To follow up.  So this is a direct copy of my source for writing vtu in
>> parallel via mpi, no edits:
>>
>> vtkSmartPointer<vtkXMLPUnstructuredGridWriter> pwriter =
>> vtkSmartPointer<vtkXMLPUnstructuredGridWriter>::New();
>> std::stringstream sss;
>> sss << outputDirectory << "/";
>> sss << outputPrefix;
>> sss << "Parts";
>> sss << ".pvtu";
>>
>> pwriter->SetFileName(sss.str().c_str());
>> pwriter->SetNumberOfPieces(comms.Size());
>> if(comms.IsParallel())
>>   pwriter->SetGhostLevel(1);
>> pwriter->SetStartPiece(comms.Rank());
>> pwriter->SetEndPiece(comms.Rank());
>> pwriter->SetInputData(cellGrid);
>> // pwriter->SetDataModeToAscii();
>> pwriter->SetDataModeToBinary();
>> pwriter->SetCompressorTypeToZLib();
>> pwriter->Write();
>>
>> and for vtp files in parallel via mpi, no edits:
>>
>> vtkSmartPointer<vtkXMLPPolyDataWriter> pwriter =
>> vtkSmartPointer<vtkXMLPPolyDataWriter>::New();
>> std::stringstream sss;
>> sss << outputDirectory << "/";
>> sss << outputPrefix;
>> sss << bcName << "_";
>> sss << prefix;
>> sss << ".pvtp";
>> std::cout << "Output file name: " << sss.str().c_str() << std::endl;
>>
>> pwriter->SetFileName(sss.str().c_str());
>> pwriter->SetNumberOfPieces(comms->Size());
>> if(comms->IsParallel())
>>   pwriter->SetGhostLevel(1);
>> pwriter->SetStartPiece(comms->Rank());
>> pwriter->SetEndPiece(comms->Rank());
>> pwriter->SetInputData(boundingFaceGrids[i]);
>> pwriter->SetDataModeToBinary();
>> //pwriter->SetDataModeToAscii();
>> pwriter->SetCompressorTypeToZLib();
>> pwriter->Write();
>>
>> I initialise the vtk-comms object in an identical way to your demo code,
>> after my own mpi-comms, and I finalize before I finalize mine.  In between
>> those calls the above source is called.  All processors partake in all
>> calls both to init the vtk-mpi and in the above writing.
>>
>> Do you have any further thoughts as to the problem?  Problem goes away if
>> I use 6.3....
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Andy
>>
>>
>> On 5 February 2018 at 18:40, Andrew Parker <andy.john.parker at googlemail.c
>> om> wrote:
>>
>>> Andy,
>>>
>>> My own code. I’ve always had those Piece lines in my src from day one,
>>> and always used it via mpi, so don’t need added. All procs call all lines
>>> in my file writer. There is no if-master-section.  Literally just a vtk
>>> version number change that causes the problem. Can’t get the data files or
>>> the cut down source until tomorrow.
>>>
>>> I shared the other two links as those in addition to this post are the
>>> only places I can find that reference such a major change to the library
>>> that is undocumented and causes such a significant change to user code. Are
>>> there any further references on this change that I can read about to try to
>>> resolve this?
>>>
>>> I find it strange that this has not come up more. It would mean all
>>> users of 7.1 without the additional vtkmpicontroller lines would fail when
>>> calling a parallel writer from a parallel mpi-user-code....
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Andy
>>>
>>> On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 at 18:07, Andy Bauer <andy.bauer at kitware.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Are you using libMesh or another simulation code? You'll definitely
>>>> need the following to tell each process what piece it has:
>>>> pwriter->SetNumberOfPieces(nprocs);
>>>>
>>>> pwriter->SetStartPiece(rank);
>>>>
>>>> pwriter->SetEndPiece(rank);
>>>>
>>>> pwriter->Write();
>>>>
>>>> Can you share the portion of your code that uses
>>>> vtkXMLPUnstructuredGridWriter? Also, looking at the data files from 6.3 and
>>>> 7.1.1 may help.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Andy
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Andrew Parker <
>>>> andy.john.parker at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Andy,
>>>>>
>>>>> Just moved from vtk 6.3.0 to vtk 7.1.1.  Cannot for the life of me get
>>>>> your modifications to work from your vtk_test.C.  I've included the
>>>>> vtkmpiController stuff after I init mpi myself.  I found the migration
>>>>> problem mentioned here:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/libMesh/libmesh/issues/1179
>>>>>
>>>>> and here:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://gitlab.kitware.com/vtk/vtk/issues/16924
>>>>>
>>>>> as well as this post.  My parallel unstructured grid now only contains
>>>>> one source within the piece section of the pvtu, as opposed to n-processor
>>>>> sources (all processors have real data to write and this is not a case of
>>>>> empty meshes on these processors).  I can re-link and recompile against 6.3
>>>>> and the problem goes away and I get the correct number of sources written
>>>>> to the pvtu file as before.  Can you help?  I make extensive use of pvtu
>>>>> files from my mpi-based code and now all grid files (pvtu and pvtp) have
>>>>> stopped working just by moving to 7.1.1 (which has been built with
>>>>> mpi-enabled).
>>>>>
>>>>> Any thoughts?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Andy
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 6 December 2016 at 16:12, Andy Bauer <andy.bauer at kitware.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi John,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The issue is indeed due to changes that I mentioned before (i.e. only
>>>>>> data sets that have data get written out and the .pvtu file is adjusted
>>>>>> accordingly). With this change though interprocess communication is
>>>>>> required which is done the the vtkMultiProcessController::GetGlobalController()
>>>>>> object which essentially acts as MPI_COMM_WORLD within VTK. You need to
>>>>>> create a vtkMPIController which derives from vtkMultiProcessController. See
>>>>>> the attached files for how that is done. This should also be backwards
>>>>>> compatible but if it isn't, please let us know.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>> Andy
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ps. Ignore the ADIOS stuff in there (it's commented out). I was
>>>>>> trying to do two things at once and that's why the ADIOS stuff is in the
>>>>>> CMakeLists.txt.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 6:06 PM, John Peterson <jwpeterson at gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Andy Bauer <andy.bauer at kitware.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Beyond this I can't think of any change off the top of my head that
>>>>>>>> would cause your issue. I looked at the repo but can't figure out the VTK
>>>>>>>> configurations from that. If you can share a simple test case which
>>>>>>>> demonstrates the issue I may be able to easily diagnose it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here's a standalone test code that reproduces the issue for me:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://gist.github.com/jwpeterson/92f4b8422d6fbb1056e848c9b14ee1d7
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Run on two procs with: mpiexec -np 2 and I get the following
>>>>>>> test.pvtu file:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <?xml version="1.0"?>
>>>>>>>> <VTKFile type="PUnstructuredGrid" version="0.1"
>>>>>>>> byte_order="LittleEndian" header_type="UInt32"
>>>>>>>> compressor="vtkZLibDataCompressor">
>>>>>>>>   <PUnstructuredGrid GhostLevel="1">
>>>>>>>>     <PPointData>
>>>>>>>>       <PDataArray type="Float64" Name="u"/>
>>>>>>>>     </PPointData>
>>>>>>>>     <PCellData>
>>>>>>>>       <PDataArray type="Int32" Name="elem_id"/>
>>>>>>>>       <PDataArray type="Int32" Name="subdomain_id"/>
>>>>>>>>       <PDataArray type="Int32" Name="processor_id"/>
>>>>>>>>     </PCellData>
>>>>>>>>     <PPoints>
>>>>>>>>       <PDataArray type="Float64" Name="Points"
>>>>>>>> NumberOfComponents="3"/>
>>>>>>>>     </PPoints>
>>>>>>>>     <Piece Source="test_0.vtu"/>
>>>>>>>>   </PUnstructuredGrid>
>>>>>>>> </VTKFile>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As you can see, only one "Piece Source" is listed, but the output of
>>>>>>> the program is actually all 3 files (test.pvtu, test_0.vtu, test_1.vtu) and
>>>>>>> both the _0 and _1 files have nodes in them.  Furthermore, if I simply add
>>>>>>> a second "Piece Source" line corresponding to "test_1.vtu", the whole thing
>>>>>>> opens up just fine in Paraview.  I am a novice VTK programmer so it's very
>>>>>>> possible I'm doing something wrong, but this code definitely worked in VTK
>>>>>>> 6.x, and 7.0.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for your help,
>>>>>>> John
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>>>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at:
>>>>>> http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>>>>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://vtk.org/pipermail/vtkusers/attachments/20180219/e42c8d79/attachment.html>


More information about the vtkusers mailing list