Please make a feature request if you like and assign it to me on <a href="http://vtk.org/Bug">vtk.org/Bug</a><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 12:29 PM, David Partyka <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:david.partyka@kitware.com">david.partyka@kitware.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">Yes that is my intention. The first step was to get it into VTK.<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:55 AM, David Gobbi <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:david.gobbi@gmail.com" target="_blank">david.gobbi@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I also have a question about hdf5... is VTK's netcdf going to be modified<br>
so that it builds against hdf5? A major feature of netcdf is that it can use<br>
hdf5 as its storage layer, but this feature is missing from VTK's netcdf.<br>
<br>
- David<br>
<div><div></div><div><br>
<br>
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:32 AM, David Partyka <<a href="mailto:david.partyka@kitware.com" target="_blank">david.partyka@kitware.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Sorry, I had forgotten about this. Do you mind reporting a bug and assigning<br>
> it to me. I'll try and get it done in the next few days. We have a macro<br>
> that does this kind of testing in CMake\vtkCheckCXXAcceptsFlags.cmake that I<br>
> can either call in the vtkhdf5 code or adapt it slightly to make the changes<br>
> to vtkhdf5 minimal.<br>
> Thanks!<br>
><br>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Sean McBride <<a href="mailto:sean@rogue-research.com" target="_blank">sean@rogue-research.com</a>><br>
> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> David,<br>
>><br>
>> Any news on no longer blindly adding the -std=c99 flag?<br>
>><br>
>> Sean<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 18:38:22 -0500, David Partyka said:<br>
>><br>
>> >Though the comment is exactly rigth, those should be compiler checks and<br>
>> > not<br>
>> >just near blindly appended to CMAKE_C_FLAGS.<br>
>> ><br>
>> >On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 6:33 PM, David Partyka<br>
>> ><<a href="mailto:david.partyka@kitware.com" target="_blank">david.partyka@kitware.com</a>>wrote:<br>
>> ><br>
>> >> I will fix the install rule. Is there a good CMake way to detect clang?<br>
>> >> Id<br>
>> >> prefer to make any fix as invasive as possible to minimize deviating<br>
>> >> from<br>
>> >> upstream.<br>
>> >><br>
>> >><br>
>> >> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Sean McBride <sean@rogue-<br>
>> <a href="http://research.com" target="_blank">research.com</a>>wrote:<br>
>> >><br>
>> >>> On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 15:54:50 -0500, Dave Partyka said:<br>
>> >>><br>
>> >>> >I have just merged commits to VTK and ParaView that move ParaView's<br>
>> >>> > HDF5<br>
>> >>> >into VTK. This migration makes it possible for VTK developers to<br>
>> >>> > begin<br>
>> >>> using<br>
>> >>> >HDF5 storage in their own VTK classes and will also allow us to<br>
>> >>> > enable<br>
>> >>> HDF5<br>
>> >>> >functionality in other Utilities (such as HDF5 enabled NetCDF). HDF5<br>
>> >>> > is<br>
>> >>> >located under Utilities/vtkhdf5. This version of HDF5 is the same<br>
>> >>> > that<br>
>> >>> was<br>
>> >>> >in ParaView (1.8.5) but now is also mangled with vtk as a prefix.<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> >I strongly recommend that ParaView developers do a clean build after<br>
>> >>> pulling<br>
>> >>> >these changes to reduce the likelihood of build failures. We will be<br>
>> >>> >watching the dashboard carefully for the next few days. If anyone<br>
>> >>> >experiences any issues please feel free to let us know and/or report<br>
>> >>> > a<br>
>> >>> bug.<br>
>> >>><br>
>> >>> Dave,<br>
>> >>><br>
>> >>> 1) when installing vtk (master) most all .h files go into /include/<br>
>> >>> vtk-5.9, except a bunch of H5*.h files go directly into /include. Is<br>
>> >>> that a bug?<br>
>> >>><br>
>> >>> 2) Building vtk with clang reports:<br>
>> >>><br>
>> >>> clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-std=c99'<br>
>> >>><br>
>> >>> This appears to come from Utilities/vtkhdf5/CMakeLists.txt<br>
>> >>><br>
>> >>><br>
>> >>> #---------------------------------<br>
>> >--------------------------------------------<br>
>> >>> # Compiler specific flags : Shouldn't there be compiler tests for<br>
>> >>> these<br>
>> >>><br>
>> >>> #---------------------------------<br>
>> >--------------------------------------------<br>
>> >>> IF (NOT WIN32)<br>
>> >>> SET (CMAKE_C_FLAGS "${CMAKE_ANSI_CFLAGS} ${CMAKE_C_FLAGS} -std=c99 -<br>
>> >>> fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -fno-common")<br>
>> >>> ENDIF (NOT WIN32)<br>
>> >>><br>
>> >>> I believe the comment is correct. :)<br>
>> >>><br>
>> >>> --<br>
>> >>> ____________________________________________________________<br>
>> >>> Sean McBride, B. Eng <a href="mailto:sean@rogue-research.com" target="_blank">sean@rogue-research.com</a><br>
>> >>> Rogue Research <a href="http://www.rogue-research.com" target="_blank">www.rogue-research.com</a><br>
>> >>> Mac Software Developer Montréal, Québec, Canada<br>
>><br>
>><br>
><br>
><br>
</div></div><div>> _______________________________________________<br>
> Powered by <a href="http://www.kitware.com" target="_blank">www.kitware.com</a><br>
><br>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at<br>
> <a href="http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html" target="_blank">http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html</a><br>
><br>
</div><div>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:<br>
</div>> <a href="http://www.vtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vtk-developers" target="_blank">http://www.vtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vtk-developers</a><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
</blockquote></div><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>