[vtk-developers] "contrib" and "local" in new tree

Bill Hoffman bill.hoffman at kitware.com
Wed Oct 31 11:07:20 EST 2001


local is no longer needed in the new tree.
Take a look at Examples/Tutorial/Step1/Cxx

It is easy not to build a new project that uses vtk, and even to use the wrapping.

-Bill

At 03:48 PM 10/30/2001 -0500, Volpe, Christopher R (CRD) wrote:
>Ok, I've looked through many of the old messages in the list, and maybe I missed it, but I can't seem
>to find any discussion of what happened to "contrib" and "local" from the old tree. I think some of
>the contrib classes moved into hybrid, but local, which provided a convenient mechanism for
>incorporating your own classes into vtk without co-mingleing them with classes under CVS control,
>appears to have vanished. I've gotten a couple of alternative ideas from people (create a separate
>project in a separate workspace, or modify the top level vtk cmake stuff to include a "local"
>project) but I wanted to know if there's a "preferred" way to do things when it comes to stuff like
>this. Feedback from people who themselves were using "local" and now have moved to an alternate
>method would be particularly appreciated.
>
>thanks,
>
>Chris
>> GE Corporate Research & Development 
>> ___________________________________________________________________________________________________
>> _______________________________________________
>> 
>Christopher R. Volpe
>Computer Scientist
>Visualization and Computer Vision Program / Electronic Systems Lab
>Bldg KW, Room C215
>P.O. Box 8, Schenectady, NY 12301
>
>(518) 387-7766, Dial Comm: 8*833-7766, Fax: (518) 387-6981
>e-mail: volpecr at crd.ge.com    web: http://www.crd.ge.com/~volpecr
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>vtk-developers mailing list
>vtk-developers at public.kitware.com
>http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtk-developers 




More information about the vtk-developers mailing list