[Rtk-users] Parker short scan test for enough over scan

Chao Wu wuchao04 at gmail.com
Mon Sep 25 08:26:32 EDT 2017


Hi Fredrik,

It is because the "halfDetectorWidth" here is the value for an untilted
virtual detector at the isocenter which is equivalant to the real detector.

Regards,
Chao

2017-09-25 14:01 GMT+02:00 Fredrik Hellman <fredrik.hellman at gmail.com>:

> Hi,
>
> In rtkParkerShortScanFilter.hxx (line 113) and
> rtkCudaParkerShortScanFilter.cxx (line 95), the overscan angle is checked
> to be large enough for the used beam fan angle. (There is a difference
> between how this check is performed in the two cases. It seems like the
> CUDA-version assumes that the piercing point is in the middle of the
> detector. That's not what this question is about though.)
>
> The beam fan angle seems to be computed as
>
> arctan( halfDetectorWidth / sourceToIsocenterDistance )
>
> Why sourceToIsocenterDistance? Shouldn't it be sourceToDetectorDistance?
> If the detector is far away from the isocenter, the beam fan angle should
> also be small as far as I understand. This is not reflected in this
> computation.
>
> Best regards,
> Fredrik Hellman
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rtk-users mailing list
> Rtk-users at public.kitware.com
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/rtk-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/rtk-users/attachments/20170925/2f8ea5fc/attachment.html>


More information about the Rtk-users mailing list