This is expected I am afraid. Convex point set is not a fully featured polyhedra. Until we have support for polyhedron, you have to tetrahedralize.<br><br>-berk<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 10/19/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">
OSHIMA Takuya</b> <<a href="mailto:oshima@eng.niigata-u.ac.jp">oshima@eng.niigata-u.ac.jp</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi,<br><br>With the latest CVS of ParaView 3.3, I'm working on a dataset which is<br>a composition of VTK_HEXAHEDRON and VTK_CONVEX_POINT_SET cells created<br>by a reader. It generally works fine but I noticed Stream Tracer can't
<br>"penetrate" VTK_CONVEX_POINT_SET cells. However after I tetrahedralize<br>the dataset Stream Tracer works fine.<br><br>The problem can also be reproduced with the modified EnSight reader<br>and a sample test case Yvan Fournier posted on Oct. 15
<br>(<a href="http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview/2007-October/006048.html">http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview/2007-October/006048.html</a>).<br><br>Is this a feature, or is there an oversight, e. g. is there any
<br>correct way of ordering vertices for a VTK_CONVEX_POINT_SET cell?<br><br>Thanks,<br>Takuya Oshima<br><br>P.S. Thanks so much for a fast fix for Python shell related crash I<br>reported a while ago!<br>_______________________________________________
<br>ParaView mailing list<br><a href="mailto:ParaView@paraview.org">ParaView@paraview.org</a><br><a href="http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview">http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview</a><br></blockquote>
</div><br>