[Paraview] Linking to Catalyst

[Gallagher, Timothy P]

Well shoot, it looks like I didn't build with the install development files on, even though I set it when I configured the superbuild. I must have done that part wrong


My configure line is:


cmake \
-DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX:PATH=${HOME}/pv-test/${version}_osmesa \
-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release \
...

-DPARAVIEW_ENABLE_CATALYST=ON \
-DPARAVIEW_ENABLE_PYTHON=ON \
-DPARAVIEW_INSTALL_DEVELOPMENT_FILES=ON \
-DPARAVIEW_BUILD_QT_GUI=OFF \
-DBUILD_TESTING=OFF \
-DVTK_USE_X=OFF \
...

-DVTK_OPENGL_HAS_OSMESA=ON \
-DOSMESA_INCLUDE_DIR:STRING="${INSTALLPATH}/osmesa/include" \
-DOSMESA_LIBRARY:STRING="${INSTALLPATH}/osmesa/lib/libOSMesa.so" \
./ParaViewSuperbuild


and all of the other PARAVIEW* options seemed to pass through properly when the superbuild made paraview. Any ideas why that option didn't pass through?


Thanks -- I knew it had to be something really obvious!


Tim



________________________________
From: Andy Bauer <andy.bauer at kitware.com>
Sent: Monday, May 9, 2016 4:43 PM
To: Gallagher, Timothy P
Cc: paraview at paraview.org
Subject: Re: [Paraview] Linking to Catalyst

Hi Tim,

Is the PV directory you're pointing to a build directory or an install directory? If it's an install directory you'll need to enable PARAVIEW_INSTALL_DEVELOPMENT_FILES. Other than that, my suggestion would be to try linking one of the Catalyst examples from https://github.com/Kitware/ParaViewCatalystExampleCode and see how that works for you. Another thing you could try is using a newer version of CMake from https://cmake.org/download/. For the Linux x86_64 tarball, you can just untar the executables from that and use directly.
[https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/87549?v=3&s=400]<https://github.com/Kitware/ParaViewCatalystExampleCode>

GitHub - Kitware/ParaViewCatalystExampleCode: Example ...<https://github.com/Kitware/ParaViewCatalystExampleCode>
github.com
ParaViewCatalystExampleCode - Example problems and snippets of code to demonstrate ParaView's Catalyst.



Let us know if none of those ideas don't work for you.

Best,
Andy

On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Gallagher, Timothy P <tim.gallagher at gatech.edu<mailto:tim.gallagher at gatech.edu>> wrote:

Hello again,


I'm (finally) trying to get Catalyst to successfully link to our application code on Excalibur (Cray, ARL HPC). I was able to build paraview and all of the dependencies thanks to help I've gotten on the list here in the past. However, when I try to link my code to it (and this is a code that works fine with Catalyst on other platforms), I get:


 CMake Error at /p/home/tgallagh/pv-test/4.4.0_osmesa/lib/cmake/paraview-4.4/vtkModuleAPI.cmake:120 (message):
   Requested modules not available:

     vtkPVPythonCatalyst
 Call Stack (most recent call first):
   /p/home/tgallagh/pv-test/4.4.0_osmesa/lib/cmake/paraview-4.4/VTKConfig.cmake:80 (vtk_module_config)
   /p/home/tgallagh/pv-test/4.4.0_osmesa/lib/cmake/paraview-4.4/ParaViewConfig.cmake:49 (include)
   CMakeLists.txt:218 (find_package)

The section in my CMakeLists that looks for paraview is:

option(LESLIE_USE_COPROCESSING "Turn on CoProcessing with Paraview" OFF)
if(LESLIE_USE_COPROCESSING)
  find_package(ParaView REQUIRED vtkPVPythonCatalyst
               HINTS $ENV{PARAVIEW_CP_ROOT})
  include(${PARAVIEW_USE_FILE})
  include_directories(${PROJECT_SOURCE_DIR}/utils)
  add_definitions(-DPARAVIEW_COPROCESSING)
endif()
mark_as_advanced(LESLIE_USE_COPROCESSING)

and it doesn't seem to work. On other machines, I never needed to set the PARAVIEW_CP_ROOT variable, it always just found it. When I build my code, I point the paraview directory (where it finds the paraviewConfig.cmake file) to:


/p/home/tgallagh/pv-test/4.4.0_osmesa/lib/cmake/paraview-4.4


and it seems to find it okay.


Lastly, the vtkPVPythonCatalyst.so library is in the lib/paraview-4.4/site-packages/vtk directory and there is libvtkPVPythonCatalyst-pv4.4.so<http://libvtkPVPythonCatalyst-pv4.4.so>* and libvtkPVPythonCatalystPython27D-pv4.4.so<http://libvtkPVPythonCatalystPython27D-pv4.4.so>* in lib/paraview-4.4/


I'm at a loss to understand why it is reporting the module is missing -- did I miss something somewhere?


Thanks as always,


Tim

_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com<http://www.kitware.com>

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20160509/31395306/attachment.html>