[Paraview] pvBatch vs. pvPython question

[Utkarsh Ayachit]

Joshua,

Odd, there should be no difference. Can you share the dataset too (feel
free to do it offline)? I can dig in further to see what's going on.

Utkarsh

On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Joshua Murphy <
Joshua.Murphy at lasp.colorado.edu> wrote:

> Hello,
>
>
>
> I am just starting to play with pvbatch, and I am seeing some behavior I
> do not understand.
>
>
>
> When using pvpython, my images are rendering as expected:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> However,  when I run the exact same script through pvbatch, I get an image
> that is not at all as I expected.
>
>
>
>
>
> Is there some idiosyncrasy with pvbatch that makes the renderings
> different?  I am attaching my script as well as the output files.
>
>
>
> Any help would be welcome!  I am using Paraview 5.1.2 downloaded from the
> paraview.org website.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Josh
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/
> opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20160822/e2bf9dba/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 84013 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20160822/e2bf9dba/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 79927 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20160822/e2bf9dba/attachment-0003.png>