[Paraview] 3.14 pvsc enumeration issues

[Burlen Loring]

Sorry, misread your reply, sounds like you would prefer to keep 
visit-bridge on. But will you disabled point-sprite in the binary 
release? I noticed that when the client has it but server does not it 
causes a crash.

On 03/05/2012 11:11 AM, Burlen Loring wrote:
> So are you disabling VisIt bridge in the binary release? If not would 
> it still lead to a crash if the binary has VB on, and the server has 
> VB off?
>
> On 03/05/2012 11:21 AM, Utkarsh Ayachit wrote:
>> Yes, I believe we ran into that as well. Short of re-factoring the
>> PointSpritePlugin, the work around for now is to disable the
>> point-sprite plugin when using visit-bridge and static builds.
>>
>> Utkarsh
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Burlen Loring<bloring at lbl.gov>  wrote:
>>> Utkarsh,
>>>
>>> By the way, not a huge issue but I also had a problem with static 
>>> builds
>>> when trying to enable the visit bridge. The visit bridge and the Point
>>> Sprite Pluign both had copies of some of the same code.
>>> http://paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=12972
>>>
>>>
>>> Burlen
>>>
>>> On 03/05/2012 10:12 AM, Utkarsh Ayachit wrote:
>>>> Burlen,
>>>>
>>>> To give you an update, we have decided to put out a patch release
>>>> within the next week or so that should include the fix for this bug.
>>>>
>>>> Utkarsh
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Burlen Loring<bloring at lbl.gov>    
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> That seems to have fixed the problem, thanks Utkarsh!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 02/29/2012 03:43 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit wrote:
>>>>>> Burlen,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Attached is a patch. Can you please verify if that solves the issue?
>>>>>> Seems to working now in my tests.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> Utkarsh
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit
>>>>>> <utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com>      wrote:
>>>>>>> Burlen,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I haven't tried reproducing the problem, but looking at the 
>>>>>>> code, it's
>>>>>>> pretty obvious why it could fail. I'll work on a fix soon. I think
>>>>>>> this and few other state file backwards compatibility related 
>>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>> that been reported may warrant a quick patch release. But I'll 
>>>>>>> check
>>>>>>> with the team once I get back next week and give everyone an 
>>>>>>> update.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Utkarsh
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Burlen Loring<bloring at lbl.gov>
>>>>>>>   wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi Rick,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> yes things are fine in 3.12 it's only with 3.14 that I'm having 
>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>> issue.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Burlen
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 02/29/2012 10:52 AM, Angelini, Richard C CIV (US) wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Burlen - I've been testing with 3.12, not 3.14 ... did things 
>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>> in 3.12 and they are now broken in 3.14?
>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Rick Angelini
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> USArmy Research Laboratory
>>>>>>>>> Computational Sciences Division/Computing Architectures Branch
>>>>>>>>> HPC Architectures Development Team
>>>>>>>>> ARL/DSRC (DoD Shared Resource Center)  Data Analysis&        
>>>>>>>>> Assessment
>>>>>>>>>   Center
>>>>>>>>> Phone:  410-278-6266
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> From: Burlen Loring [bloring at lbl.gov]
>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 1:29 PM
>>>>>>>>> To: Angelini, Richard C CIV (US)
>>>>>>>>> Cc: paraview at paraview.org
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Paraview] 3.14 pvsc enumeration issues
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Rick,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Good, maybe it's something specific to my configuration 
>>>>>>>>> although I
>>>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>>>> have any idea what it could be off hand. Just to be sure: do 
>>>>>>>>> you mean
>>>>>>>>> that you haven't had noticed problems or that you've positively
>>>>>>>>> verified
>>>>>>>>> that after using the enum once you could change the value?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>>>> Burlen
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 02/29/2012 10:31 AM, Angelini, Richard C CIV (US) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> What platform is the client running on?   We make extensive 
>>>>>>>>>> use of
>>>>>>>>>> pvsc
>>>>>>>>>> and enumerations and have not seen this  (mis)behavior on our
>>>>>>>>>> Mac/Linux
>>>>>>>>>> client workstations......
>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> Rick Angelini
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> USArmy Research Laboratory
>>>>>>>>>> Computational Sciences Division/Computing Architectures Branch
>>>>>>>>>> HPC Architectures Development Team
>>>>>>>>>> ARL/DSRC (DoD Shared Resource Center)  Data Analysis&
>>>>>>>>>> Assessment
>>>>>>>>>>   Center
>>>>>>>>>> Phone:  410-278-6266
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> From: paraview-bounces at paraview.org 
>>>>>>>>>> [paraview-bounces at paraview.org]
>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>> behalf of Burlen Loring [bloring at lbl.gov]
>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 12:58 PM
>>>>>>>>>> To: paraview at paraview.org
>>>>>>>>>> Subject: [Paraview] 3.14 pvsc enumeration issues
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I've encountered bugs with pvsc enumerations in version 
>>>>>>>>>> 3.14.0. I
>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>> the attached pvsc that makes use of a couple of enumerations. 
>>>>>>>>>> After
>>>>>>>>>> connecting once w/ this pvsc, neither of the enums save the 
>>>>>>>>>> user's
>>>>>>>>>> choice in the GUI the next time the server is used. However they
>>>>>>>>>> seem
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> remember the user's last choice internally and always uses that
>>>>>>>>>> instead
>>>>>>>>>> of what the user has selected in the GUI. Neither setting 
>>>>>>>>>> save=false
>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>> removing the default attribute helps. I filed the bug report 
>>>>>>>>>> here.
>>>>>>>>>> http://paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=12969 If it's confirmed 
>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> bug be fixed in another 3.14 release? or should I simply remove
>>>>>>>>>> enumerations from our pvsc's for 3.14?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Burlen
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>>>>>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
>>>>>>>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>>>>>>> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>>>>>
>