[Paraview] 3.14 pvsc enumeration issues

Utkarsh Ayachit utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com
Mon Mar 5 13:12:36 EST 2012


Burlen,

To give you an update, we have decided to put out a patch release
within the next week or so that should include the fix for this bug.

Utkarsh

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Burlen Loring <bloring at lbl.gov> wrote:
> That seems to have fixed the problem, thanks Utkarsh!
>
>
> On 02/29/2012 03:43 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit wrote:
>>
>> Burlen,
>>
>> Attached is a patch. Can you please verify if that solves the issue?
>> Seems to working now in my tests.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Utkarsh
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit
>> <utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Burlen,
>>>
>>> I haven't tried reproducing the problem, but looking at the code, it's
>>> pretty obvious why it could fail. I'll work on a fix soon. I think
>>> this and few other state file backwards compatibility related issues
>>> that been reported may warrant a quick patch release. But I'll check
>>> with the team once I get back next week and give everyone an update.
>>>
>>> Utkarsh
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Burlen Loring<bloring at lbl.gov>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Rick,
>>>>
>>>> yes things are fine in 3.12 it's only with 3.14 that I'm having this
>>>> issue.
>>>>
>>>> Burlen
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 02/29/2012 10:52 AM, Angelini, Richard C CIV (US) wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Burlen - I've been testing with 3.12, not 3.14 ... did things work for
>>>>> you
>>>>> in 3.12 and they are now broken in 3.14?
>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>> Rick Angelini
>>>>>
>>>>> USArmy Research Laboratory
>>>>> Computational Sciences Division/Computing Architectures Branch
>>>>> HPC Architectures Development Team
>>>>> ARL/DSRC (DoD Shared Resource Center)  Data Analysis&    Assessment
>>>>>  Center
>>>>> Phone:  410-278-6266
>>>>>
>>>>> ________________________________________
>>>>> From: Burlen Loring [bloring at lbl.gov]
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 1:29 PM
>>>>> To: Angelini, Richard C CIV (US)
>>>>> Cc: paraview at paraview.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Paraview] 3.14 pvsc enumeration issues
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Rick,
>>>>>
>>>>> Good, maybe it's something specific to my configuration although I
>>>>> don't
>>>>> have any idea what it could be off hand. Just to be sure: do you mean
>>>>> that you haven't had noticed problems or that you've positively
>>>>> verified
>>>>> that after using the enum once you could change the value?
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks
>>>>> Burlen
>>>>>
>>>>> On 02/29/2012 10:31 AM, Angelini, Richard C CIV (US) wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What platform is the client running on?   We make extensive use of
>>>>>> pvsc
>>>>>> and enumerations and have not seen this  (mis)behavior on our
>>>>>> Mac/Linux
>>>>>> client workstations......
>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>> Rick Angelini
>>>>>>
>>>>>> USArmy Research Laboratory
>>>>>> Computational Sciences Division/Computing Architectures Branch
>>>>>> HPC Architectures Development Team
>>>>>> ARL/DSRC (DoD Shared Resource Center)  Data Analysis&     Assessment
>>>>>>  Center
>>>>>> Phone:  410-278-6266
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ________________________________________
>>>>>> From: paraview-bounces at paraview.org [paraview-bounces at paraview.org] on
>>>>>> behalf of Burlen Loring [bloring at lbl.gov]
>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 12:58 PM
>>>>>> To: paraview at paraview.org
>>>>>> Subject: [Paraview] 3.14 pvsc enumeration issues
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've encountered bugs with pvsc enumerations in version 3.14.0. I have
>>>>>> the attached pvsc that makes use of a couple of enumerations. After
>>>>>> connecting once w/ this pvsc, neither of the enums save the user's
>>>>>> choice in the GUI the next time the server is used. However they seem
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> remember the user's last choice internally and always uses that
>>>>>> instead
>>>>>> of what the user has selected in the GUI. Neither setting save=false
>>>>>> or
>>>>>> removing the default attribute helps. I filed the bug report here.
>>>>>> http://paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=12969 If it's confirmed would the
>>>>>> bug be fixed in another 3.14 release? or should I simply remove
>>>>>> enumerations from our pvsc's for 3.14?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Burlen
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>>
>>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>>
>>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
>>>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>>>>
>>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>>> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
>


More information about the ParaView mailing list