<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: [Paraview-developers] Requiring Qt 4.6 for ParaView 3.8</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'>Yup, that sounds like the issue I’m running into. However, I was hoping there would be a single fix that would work for all users. Compiling ParaView can be tricky enough for users/developers/support staff. It would be nice if it compiled with the suggested version of Qt without having to odd modifications like this.<BR>
<BR>
-Ken<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
On 2/8/10 9:15 AM, "Clinton Stimpson" <<a href="clinton@elemtech.com">clinton@elemtech.com</a>> wrote:<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT><BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'><BR>
<BR>
If this is the issue I'm thinking of, the Qt dmg installer creates a dummy<BR>
QtDBus.framework that CMake thinks is real. So it tries to link it in because<BR>
of a phonon dependency. (If QtDbus exists, phonon depends on it).<BR>
<BR>
I ran into this issue building VTK with Qt 4.6 from the dmg installer.<BR>
<BR>
My workaround was to rename the QtDbus.framwork directory, and start a clean<BR>
build (or edit the cmake files).<BR>
<BR>
Should find_library() be returning "/some/path/foo.framework/foo" instead of<BR>
"/some/path/foo.framework" in which case this fake QtDbus.framework wouldn't<BR>
be an issue.<BR>
<BR>
Clint<BR>
<BR>
On Monday 08 February 2010 09:00:49 am Moreland, Kenneth wrote:<BR>
> I was planning on upgrading to Qt 4.6, but there is an issue with the LGPL<BR>
> binaries for Mac: it is missing the QtDBus library. I couldn't find the<BR>
> source, so I decided it was too much of a hassle to bother. I just tried<BR>
> again this morning. The QtDBus library is still missing and I still can't<BR>
> find the LGPL sources. Is there any way of making VTK/ParaView not depend<BR>
> on QtDBus?<BR>
><BR>
> -Ken<BR>
><BR>
><BR>
> On 2/6/10 3:32 PM, "Utkarsh Ayachit" <<a href="utkarsh.ayachit@kitware.com">utkarsh.ayachit@kitware.com</a>> wrote:<BR>
><BR>
> Folks,<BR>
><BR>
> As we are approaching 3.8 branch, what does everyone think of making<BR>
> Qt 4.6 the officially supported version? Quite a few of us have been<BR>
> using Qt 4.6 for quite some time now and don't think there are any<BR>
> issues.<BR>
><BR>
> Utkarsh<BR>
> _______________________________________________<BR>
> Paraview-developers mailing list<BR>
> <a href="Paraview-developers@paraview.org">Paraview-developers@paraview.org</a><BR>
> <a href="http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview-developers">http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview-developers</a><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
> **** Kenneth Moreland<BR>
> *** Sandia National Laboratories<BR>
> ***********<BR>
> *** *** *** email: <a href="kmorel@sandia.gov">kmorel@sandia.gov</a><BR>
> ** *** ** phone: (505) 844-8919<BR>
> *** web: <a href="http://www.cs.unm.edu/~kmorel">http://www.cs.unm.edu/~kmorel</a><BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'><BR>
</SPAN></FONT><FONT SIZE="2"><FONT FACE="Consolas, Courier New, Courier"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:10pt'><BR>
**** Kenneth Moreland<BR>
*** Sandia National Laboratories<BR>
*********** <BR>
*** *** *** email: <a href="kmorel@sandia.gov">kmorel@sandia.gov</a><BR>
** *** ** phone: (505) 844-8919<BR>
*** web: <a href="http://www.cs.unm.edu/~kmorel">http://www.cs.unm.edu/~kmorel</a><BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'><BR>
</SPAN></FONT>
</BODY>
</HTML>