I wouldn't object to supporting 4.5 and 4.6. I think setting up 1-2 dashboards to verify building with 4.5 would be enough. We don't run into Qt specific bugs too often anyway. I defer to Utkarsh though.<br><br>Also, if there is an attractive feature on the latest version of Qt that will make our lives much easier, we are likely to move to it and not support the previous version. So, I don't want to have an official rule about supporting more than 1 version.<br>
<br>-berk<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 3:08 PM, burlen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:burlen.loring@gmail.com">burlen.loring@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Will this mean that PV won't build with any thing less than Qt 4.6?<br>
I wonder if it would make sense to have a small range of supported versions rather than a single one?<br>
<br>
It's currently the case that with qt anything less than 4.5 pv fails to compile (even if you remove the version test in cmakelists) because pv uses some qt classes that were only added to 4.5. In my opinion it would be a burden to pv users to get too far ahead of the various KDE supported distro's packages. eg. Kubuntu 9.10 reports qt version 4.5.2. KUbuntu 8.04.4 LTS reports qt version 4.3.4.<br>
<br>