Sounds good to me. I already have switched a few dashboards over. I'll check in the the logic change to warn if Qt 4.5 is found and error if it is older.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Berk Geveci <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:berk.geveci@kitware.com">berk.geveci@kitware.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">I think that it is a great idea.<br><font color="#888888"><br>-berk</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:utkarsh.ayachit@kitware.com" target="_blank">utkarsh.ayachit@kitware.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left:1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex">Folks,<br>
<br>
As we are approaching 3.8 branch, what does everyone think of making<br>
Qt 4.6 the officially supported version? Quite a few of us have been<br>
using Qt 4.6 for quite some time now and don't think there are any<br>
issues.<br>
<br>
Utkarsh<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Paraview-developers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Paraview-developers@paraview.org" target="_blank">Paraview-developers@paraview.org</a><br>
<a href="http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview-developers" target="_blank">http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview-developers</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>
</div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Paraview-developers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Paraview-developers@paraview.org">Paraview-developers@paraview.org</a><br>
<a href="http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview-developers" target="_blank">http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview-developers</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>