But it is virtual, by virtue of inheriting such status from its base class:<div><br></div><div><a href="http://www.itk.org/Doxygen48/html/itkLightObject_8h_source.html">http://www.itk.org/Doxygen48/html/itkLightObject_8h_source.html</a></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>HTH,</div><div>David C.</div><div><br><br>On Friday, September 4, 2015, Vaaksiainen <<a href="mailto:vaaksiainen@gmail.com">vaaksiainen@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div><div>Retyping the header: is the itk::Command destructor non-virtual on purpose?<br><br><a href="http://www.itk.org/Doxygen48/html/itkCommand_8h_source.html" target="_blank">http://www.itk.org/Doxygen48/html/itkCommand_8h_source.html</a><br><span></span><br>64 protected:<br>65  Command();<br>66  ~Command();<br><br></div><div>The way I used its derivatives, don't see any reason for such.<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div>Best regards,<br></div>-Vaaksiainen<br><br></div>
</blockquote></div>