<HTML><BODY>
<div>Hi,<SPAN contentEditable=false style="DISPLAY: inline-block"></SPAN></div>
<div> </div>
<div>Now I got a strange results from FA (eq.27), MD, linear(eq.37), planar(eq.38), spherial(eq.39) images.</div>
<div>For FA image, the intensity range is greater than [0,1], in fact [0, 1.227];</div>
<div>For MD image, I got some pixels in negative intensity, [-0.00069, 0.0047];</div>
<div>As for linear(eq.37), planar(eq.38), spherial(eq.39) images, none of their intensities were fully sat in the range of [0,1];</div>
<div>so am I missing some normalization before those measurement were calculated?</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Eqs are as appearred in <A href="http://splweb.bwh.harvard.edu:8000/pages/papers/westin/ISMRM2002.pdf">splweb.bwh.harvard.edu:8000/pages/papers/westin/ISMRM2002.pdf</A></div>
<div> </div>
<div>Thanks.</div>
<div> </div>
<div class="AOLPromoFooter">
<hr style="margin-top:10px;" />
<a href="http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100122638x1081283466x1074645346/aol?redir=http://email.aol.co.uk" target="_blank"><b>Check out the new free AOL Email</b></a> -- 2GB of storage and industry-leading spam and email virus protection.<br />
</div>
</BODY></HTML>