On 2/9/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Xabier Artaechevarria Artieda</b> <<a href="mailto:xabiarta@unav.es">xabiarta@unav.es</a>> wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hallo Christoph,<br>Thanks for the answer.<br>I checked after 174 iterations and the overlap seems in fact good, </blockquote><div><br>How did you ascertain the fact that the overlap is good ? (I presume you checked the transform, but I don' tsee it printed in the log). There must be a significant drift in teh transform from teh initial position to the position after 174 iterations to prompt this error.
<br><br>DId you try resampling with the transform and overlaying the images to make sure that the transforms are headed in the right direction ?<br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
and<br>it is considerably better than at the first iteration. Do you think I<br>could solve the problem by using a higher number of spatial samples?<br>Now I am using one tenth of the total voxels.</blockquote><div><br>1/10th for MI is plenty.
<br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br></blockquote></div>