[Insight-users] Re: ITK1.8 increased space?

[Vincent Luboz]

Hi James

Thanks for the information. This RelWithDebInfo version sounds pretty good!
Just two small questions: do we have to keep the Debug variable in the 
compilation configuration?  
CMAKE_CONFIGURATION_TYPES:STRING=Debug;Release;RelWithDebInfo
or do we have to write:
CMAKE_CONFIGURATION_TYPES:STRING=Release;RelWithDebInfo
And once you have compile ITK like that, you can compile your code in Release 
and in Debug (with 95% of the "real" Debug option)?

Thanks in advance,

Vincent.


Quoting "Miller, James V (Research)" <millerjv at crd.ge.com>:
> Vincent, 
> 
> You might want to check into building RelWithDebInfo instead
> of both Release and Debug.  You can setup a RelWithDebInfo
> build by adding RelWithDebInfo to your CMAKE_CONFIGURATION_TYPES (should be
> an advanced option
> in CMakeSetup).
> 
> CMAKE_CONFIGURATION_TYPES:STRING=Debug;Release;RelWithDebInfo
> 
> RelWithDebInfo uses most of the compiler optimization of
> Release but also have enough Debugging information so that
> you can find out why a program crashed.  It also has
> enough debugging information so that you can run 
> memory checking software like Purify or performance 
> checking software like Quantify.
> 
> I almost exclusively use a RelWithDebInfo build.  The 
> execution times are fast but when something crashes I 
> can usually figure out why.  Since RelWithDebInfo is
> an optimized build, not all variables will be available
> in the debugger (some variables get optimized away). But
> the call stack is usually in pretty good shape so that 
> you can at least know the line of code where the program
> crashed.
> 
> I can do about 95% of my debugging on a RelWithDebInfo
> build.  The last 5% of the time, I have to break down 
> and build a debug version.
> 
> Jim
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vincent Luboz [mailto:Vincent.Luboz at imag.fr]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 5:38 PM
> To: Luis Ibanez
> Cc: Insight-users at itk.org
> Subject: Re: [Insight-users] Re: ITK1.8 increased space?
> 
> 
> Hi Luis
> 
> I am using VisualStudio .Net 2003 Windows XP and I built ITK in release and
> in 
> debug versions. Your numbers are right, in release version, ITK occupies
> 1.6GB.
> But since I also compiled in Debug, ITK reached 6GB.
> All the warping (TCL, Java...) was disabled
> Since the Debug version is pretty useful, I am going to keep it.
> Thanks again for your help,
> 
> Vincent.
> 
> Quoting Luis Ibanez <luis.ibanez at kitware.com>:
> > 
> > Hi Vincent
> > 
> > Thanks for pointing this out.
> > 
> > This is actually useful information.
> > 
> > 6 GigaBytes sounds a bit excesive for a build of ITK.
> > 
> > Here are some numbers from our local builds, that include
> > Examples ON and Testing ON, building for Release:
> > 
> >    1) 1.6 GigaBytes in VisualStudio .Net 2003 Windows XP
> >    2) 1.2 GigaBytes in GCC 3.3 under Linux Debian
> > 
> > 
> > You may want to double check that you didn't enabled any of the
> > wrappings (Tcl, Python or Java), and that you are building only
> > for Release or only for Debug (if you are using MS-Windows...).
> > Otherwise that will duplicate the disk usage.
> > 
> > 
> > If you are in Windows, you may find useful to try the
> > application "Treesize":
> > 
> >         http://www.tucows.com/preview/195999.html
> > 
> > in order to figure out where the disk space is being
> > taken per directory.
> > 
> > 
> > If you are in Unix, you can simply do "du" in the binary directory
> > where you build ITK.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Please let us know what you find,
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >    Thanks
> > 
> > 
> >       Luis
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -----------------------------
> > Vincent.Luboz at imag.fr wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi Luis
> > > 
> > > I didn't put this message on the itk list because it's not useful for
> the 
> > > list, I think...
> > > I just installed ITK1.8, with build examples ON, build shared library
> OFF
> > and 
> > > build testing ON. It results in a repertory of:
> > > 6 Go and 18 000 files
> > > By comparison, ITK1.6 with the same configuration was only:
> > > 700 Mo and 12 000 files
> > > Is it normal?
> > > 
> > > Vincent
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -------------------------------------------------
> > > envoye via Webmail/IMAG !
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Insight-users mailing list
> > Insight-users at itk.org
> > http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-users
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------
> envoye via Webmail/IMAG !
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Insight-users mailing list
> Insight-users at itk.org
> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-users
> _______________________________________________
> Insight-users mailing list
> Insight-users at itk.org
> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-users
> 




-------------------------------------------------
envoyé via Webmail/IMAG !