[Insight-developers] [ITK Community] Remote modules License

[Luke Bloy]

Thanks Matt,

Do people think this license (
http://www.rad.upenn.edu/sbia/software/license.html ) would have any
issues? My belief is that it is based strongly off apache 2.

Thanks again.
Luke


On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Matt McCormick <matt.mccormick at kitware.com
> wrote:

> Hi Luke,
>
> There has been considerable work into keeping the repository
> patent-free and minimize copyleft licenses (see the CMake warning when
> FFTW support is enabled, which is off by default).
>
> The preferred license is Apache 2.0 with copyright assigned to the
> Insight Software Consortium, like the rest of the toolkit.  Other
> BSD-style licenses should well work, too.
>
> I personally would be fine with most other licenses, too, for a Remote
> Module, but it also depends on the input of other members of the
> community.
>
> Thanks,
> Matt
>
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:29 PM, Luke Bloy <luke.bloy at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Are there any license requirements for being considered for inclusion as
> a
> > remote module?
> >
> > Luke
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Powered by www.kitware.com
> >
> > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> >
> > Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
> > http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php
> >
> > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
> > http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
> >
> > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> > http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Community mailing list
> > Community at itk.org
> > http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.itk.org/pipermail/insight-developers/attachments/20140130/a7392d8a/attachment.html>