[Insight-developers] A Contrib group?

[Bill Lorensen]

I agree with both of Brad's comments.


On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Brad King <brad.king at kitware.com> wrote:
> On 01/16/2014 10:51 AM, Bradley Lowekamp wrote:
>> It's not clear from your(s) comments if you are in favor of using
>> remote modules for all new modules or not?
>
> No.  AFAIK remote modules are to be used when their maintainers
> intentionally want to distribute the module separately from
> upstream ITK.  I don't think they should be part of the review
> process for contributions intended to go upstream.
>
>> Or if small new contribution like a single class should be added
>> as separate module or integrated into the appropriate existing module?
>
> It should be integrated in an appropriate existing module if it
> makes sense and otherwise used to create a new module.  That
> decision should be part of the review process.  In either case
> by putting the code right in the source tree for review then
> we get Gerrit and CDash at Home to test it.
>
> -Brad K
>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers



-- 
Unpaid intern in BillsBasement at noware dot com