[Insight-developers] Compliance problem with Mac

[Johnson, Hans J]

Brad,

THANKS.  A gerrit patch is being created.

I remove all the integer base complex types  because they were never used.

Also, I determined that it is highly likely that those types were simply
copy/paste paradigm of other macro wrappings where integer types do make
sense.


Also as a side note from my previous example

clang++ x.cpp ­o test <‹ FAILED to compile
clang++ x.cpp ­o test -stdlib=libstdc++ <‹ PASSED COMPLIATION


Thanks,
Hans


From:  Bradley Lowekamp <brad at lowekamp.net>
Date:  Wednesday, October 30, 2013 at 8:21 PM
To:  Hans Johnson <hans.j.johnson at gmail.com>
Cc:  ITK <insight-developers at itk.org>, "brad.king at kitware.com"
<brad.king at kitware.com>, "matt.mccormick at kitware.com"
<matt.mccormick at kitware.com>
Subject:  Re: Compliance problem with Mac



On Oct 30, 2013, at 8:30 PM, Hans Johnson <hans.j.johnson at gmail.com> wrote:


std::complex<unsigned long>



I don't believe the above is valid.

http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/complex/complex/
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11108587/why-does-abscomplexint-always-r
eturn-zero

Brad



________________________________
Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  Please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error, then delete it.  Thank you.
________________________________