[Insight-developers] valgrind & ITK

Bill Lorensen bill.lorensen at gmail.com
Thu Feb 2 14:12:54 EST 2012


Gaëtan,

Just to be clear. Your valgrind build machine is fine. Sean is setting
up a new machine.

Bill

2012/2/2 Gaëtan Lehmann <gaetan.lehmann at jouy.inra.fr>:
>
> Le 2 févr. 12 à 18:53, Sean McBride a écrit :
>
>
>> On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:08:55 -0500, Sean McBride said:
>>
>>> We've been setting up a valgrind dashboard, but the execution times of
>>> ITK tests range across several orders of magnitude.
>>>
>>> This makes choosing a timeout difficult, and especially so with
>>> valgrind, where execution takes so much longer.
>>>
>>> Could maybe the slowest ITK tests be broken up into several tests? Or is
>>> there a way to specify different timeouts for with and without valgrind?
>>
>>
>> No one has any thoughts on this?...
>>
>>
>> Our next problem is that there are many thousands of valgrind warnings
>> from python.  From the logs:
>>
>> 100: MemCheck command: /usr/local/bin/valgrind "--trace-children=yes"
>> "--quiet" "--tool=memcheck" "--leak-check=yes" "--show-reachable=yes"
>> "--num-callers=50" "--verbose" "--demangle=yes" "--gen-suppressions=all"
>> "--suppressions=/home/builder/external/ITK/CMake/InsightValgrind.supp"
>> "/usr/bin/python" "/home/builder/external/ITK/Utilities/Doxygen/mcdoc.py"
>> "check" "ITKCommon" "/home/builder/external/ITK/Modules/Core/Common/include"
>>
>> As you can see valgrind is invoked on python itself, therefore flagging
>> issues within python itself.
>>
>> The valgrind docs discuss this:
>>
>> <http://valgrind.org/docs/manual/manual-core.html>
>>
>> "Note that you should run the real (machine-code) executable here. If your
>> application is started by, for example, a shell or Perl script, you'll need
>> to modify it to invoke Valgrind on the real executables. Running such
>> scripts directly under Valgrind will result in you getting error reports
>> pertaining to /bin/sh, /usr/bin/perl, or whatever interpreter you're using.
>> This may not be what you want and can be confusing. You can force the issue
>> by giving the option --trace-children=yes, but confusion is still likely."
>>
>> Should this be fixed with suppressions?  I see some python 2.6
>> suppressions in InsightValgrind.supp already....
>
>
>
> This tests should not be run with valgrind.
> I thought I've done that a few months ago... I'll try to look at that in the
> next days.
>
> Gaëtan
>
> --
> Gaëtan Lehmann
> Biologie du Développement et de la Reproduction
> INRA de Jouy-en-Josas (France)
> tel: +33 1 34 65 29 66    fax: 01 34 65 29 09
> http://mima2.jouy.inra.fr  http://www.itk.org
> http://www.bepo.fr
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>



-- 
Unpaid intern in BillsBasement at noware dot com


More information about the Insight-developers mailing list