[Insight-developers] SimpleITK dashboard

Wed Jul 27 15:52:59 EDT 2011

What flavor of Linux are you running?

On 27 July 2011 21:13, Daniel Blezek <Blezek.Daniel at mayo.edu> wrote:
> Hmm, did a test build, and got this error:
>
> [ 57%] Generating CSharpTests/TestMirrorPadImageFilter.cs
> error CS2007: Unrecognized command-line option: `/platform:x64'
>
> the results should be up on the dashboard soon.
>
> -dan
>
>
> On 7/27/11 1:40 PM, "Daniel Blezek" <Blezek.Daniel at mayo.edu> wrote:
>
>> OK, I installed mono-core and mono-devel.  Check the dashboard tomorrow to see
>> if all went well!
>>
>> -dan
>>
>>
>> On 7/27/11 11:32 AM, "Dan Mueller" <dan.muel at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Dan,
>>>
>>>>  If I install Mono, will SimpleITK automatically detect and configure?
>>> Yes, C# is considered a "first class" language -- if the packages are
>>> installed, CMake tries to find it in the following locations:
>>>
>>>   # Search for Mono on non-Win32 systems
>>>   set( chsarp_mono_names "dmcs" "gmcs" "mcs" "dmcs.exe" "gmcs.exe" "mcs.exe"
>>> )
>>>   set(
>>>     csharp_mono_paths
>>>     "/usr/bin/"
>>>     "/usr/local/bin/"
>>>     "/usr/lib/mono/2.0"
>>>   )
>>>   find_program(
>>>     NAMES ${chsarp_mono_names}
>>>     PATHS ${csharp_mono_paths}
>>>   )
>>>
>>> This has been tested on Ubuntu; not sure how it goes on other Linux flavors.
>>>
>>> Regards, Dan Mueller
>>>
>>> On 27 July 2011 18:22, Daniel Blezek <Blezek.Daniel at mayo.edu> wrote:
>>>> Hi Dan,
>>>>
>>>>  If I install Mono, will SimpleITK automatically detect and configure?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> -dan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 7/27/11 7:30 AM, "Dan Mueller" <dan.muel at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi John,
>>>>>
>>>>> Submitting a SimpleITK build on CentOS with Mono C# would be great!
>>>>>
>>>>> You can find details for installing Mono packages here:
>>>>>     http://www.mono-project.com/Mono_Installation
>>>>>     http://ftp.novell.com/pub/mono/download-stable/RHEL_5
>>>>>
>>>>>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3510320/install-mono-on-centos5-5-using->>>>
> y
>>>>> um
>>>>>
>>>>> Someone else will have to give instructions for submitting a SimpleITK
>>>>> build to the dashboard (David?, Dan B?). Perhaps the following wiki
>>>>> page can help get you started:
>>>>>     http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_Policy_and_Procedure_for_Adding_Dashboards
>>>>>
>>>>> Looking forward to seeing Linux + SimpleITK + C# builds on the dashboard!
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers, Dan Mueller
>>>>>
>>>>> On 26 July 2011 18:04, John McInerney <jmcinerney6 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Dear Dan,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have a CentOS machine that I would love to try Mono for C# wrapping.  I
>>>>>> have 30 years of UNIX/Linux/etc.  Been doing CUDA for a while now.  I am
>>>>>> hoping Bioscan can just deliver a single machine with our instruments
>>>>>> that'll do
>>>>>> everything down stream from the embeded (headless) system: GUI,
>>>>>> reconstruction,
>>>>>> segmentation, and registration.  So, that's my motivation...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Been hanging on by my nails with the ITK upgrade.  Can't say I follow
>>>>>> everything,
>>>>>> but I'm a quick study.  I can do the Mono install.  It may take some time
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> get
>>>>>> ITK 4 going to get to where you are at...  I have code that ran under ITK
>>>>>> 3...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> John
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Dan Mueller <dan.muel at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Brad,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The SimpleITK dashboard is looking good this morning :D (At least for
>>>>>>> Linux and Win32 builds.) Out of interest, what branch are these
>>>>>>> machines using? I am using remote stage/next, but still get the
>>>>>>> DIRECTIONCOLLAPSETOIDENTITY errors...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also, are you in charge of the Linux box mi3c-qbert.mayo.edu? I'm just
>>>>>>> wondering if it would be possible to install Mono so that C# wrapping
>>>>>>> on Linux is covered (unfortunately I don't have access to a Linux
>>>>>>> machine for submitting builds at the moment). If you tell me the Linux
>>>>>>> flavour, I can provide the few commands needed to install the 2 or 3
>>>>>>> Mono-related packages.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers, Dan Mueller
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 25 July 2011 15:49, Bradley Lowekamp <blowekamp at mail.nih.gov> wrote:
>>>>>>>> I agree that is starting to be concerning with the size of the library.
>>>>>>>> I am
>>>>>>>> still amazed with how much it shrinks when the wrapped language library
>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>> made. There should be something we can do about this.
>>>>>>>> That is great you found a solution. The attached diff is fine. I will
>>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>>> it onto the end of the current topic. And hopefully, it'll be ready for
>>>>>>>> merging into master!
>>>>>>>> Brad
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Jul 25, 2011, at 1:13 AM, Dan Mueller wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Brad,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Debug builds on windows 32-bit systems may not be supported. The library
>>>>>>>> just gets too big. You should try to build a release.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks for the info regarding the release build -- I do not encounter
>>>>>>>> the "can not seek" error in release mode. However, I notice that
>>>>>>>> SimpleITKBasicFilters.lib comes to 700MB, which is getting close to
>>>>>>>> 1GB; perhaps something to watch for in the future as SimpleITK grows.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This morning I located the issue with the SimpleITK C# Visual Studio
>>>>>>>> 2008 build: it seems VS9 can not handle source dependencies specified
>>>>>>>> using a wildcard. I have changed
>>>>>>>> Wrapping/CSharpModules/UseCSharp.cmake to glob any wildcard
>>>>>>>> expressions (as well as a minor bug fix for FindCSharp when using
>>>>>>>> outside of SimpleITK). I have tested the changes using VS9, VS10, and
>>>>>>>> make on Unbuntu. Please find the corrected files attached and diff
>>>>>>>> below. What is your preferred way of working? Do I push the patch to
>>>>>>>> Gerrit?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers, Dan Mueller
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Daniel Blezek, PhD
>>>> Medical Imaging Informatics Innovation Center
>>>>
>>>> P 127 or (77) 8 8886
>>>> T 507 538 8886
>>>> E blezek.daniel at mayo.edu
>>>>
>>>> Mayo Clinic
>>>> 200 First St. S.W.
>>>> Harwick SL-44
>>>> Rochester, MN 55905
>>>> mayoclinic.org
>>>> "It is more complicated than you think." -- RFC 1925
>>>>
>>>>
>
> --
> Daniel Blezek, PhD
> Medical Imaging Informatics Innovation Center
>
> P 127 or (77) 8 8886
> T 507 538 8886
> E blezek.daniel at mayo.edu
>
> Mayo Clinic
> 200 First St. S.W.
> Harwick SL-44
> Rochester, MN 55905
> mayoclinic.org
> "It is more complicated than you think." -- RFC 1925
>
>